By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Pesticide overspray from nearby farms hurts state grapes
Pile
Town of Belmont grape grower Ted Kearns said he piled up more than 300 10-year-old vines in his driveway after they died from herbicidal drift last year.

Grape farmers in Wisconsin are facing a growing threat, and in many cases it is coming from their own neighbors.

Herbicides used to kill weeds in crops such as corn and soybeans can be deadly to other plants, including grapes. Food or wine grape vines exposed to the chemicals may shrivel up, turn colors and grow strange, elongated new leaves.

“It just becomes a bizarre, distorted structure,” said Judy Reith-Rozelle, a consultant and horticulture researcher at UW–Madison. “The grape farmers are real worried.”

Wisconsin’s grape industry is growing fast. A U.S. Department of Agriculture survey released this spring shows that the number of farms has doubled since 2005, and the state adds an average of nine new vineyards each year.

Wisconsin now has more than 100 commercial vineyards. Wisconsin grapes are mainly used for wine, though some growers produce table grapes and grapes for juice.

UW–Extension estimates the industry generates about $200 million per year in sales and labor.

But grapes are highly sensitive to a commonly used class of herbicides known as plant growth regulators, which kill broadleaf plants. Vineyards located near corn and soybean producers are at risk if the herbicides drift onto their crops.

Ryan Prellwitz, president of the Wisconsin Grape Growers Association, frequently hears complaints from grape farmers.

“It’s a problem that, if not dealt with, could cause a significant economic impact to the vineyards and wineries around the state,” he said.

The state Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection is trying to address the problem.

The agency is encouraging specialty crop farmers to register on DriftWatch (driftwatch.org), an online database created by Purdue University. The goal is to increase awareness and reduce the misuse of herbicides by neighboring farms.

DATCP recently hired a part-time employee to encourage specialty farmers with sensitive crops to sign up with DriftWatch and for applicators to consult the registry before applying herbicides.

Ann Marie Ames, DATCP’s new employee, networks with farmers and helps them add their farms to the database. She said 329 producers are registered on the site, including 86 vineyards.

“It’s not going to stop pesticide drift, but it gives us a pretty good way to talk about it,” Ames said.

Ames said grapes are not the only specialty crop at risk. Beekeepers, fruit and berry farmers, hop growers and organic farmers also can register on DriftWatch.

“This isn’t the end-all be-all solution — this is one tool,” said Ames, adding that ultimately “the responsibility falls back on the producers to speak up for themselves.”

Farmer against farmer

At issue is a class of commonly used growth-regulating herbicides including dicamba and 2,4-D.

“Any time you’ve got this confluence of two major forces, there’s likely to be some conflict,” said Donna Gilson, DATCP spokeswoman. “I think it’s the rise of the grape growing industry, and it’s happening in a lot of the corn and soybean growing country in Wisconsin.”

When applied selectively to corn and soybean crops, the chemicals kill weeds such as thistle, burr and wild mustard and leave the crop unharmed.

But when the herbicides are applied, the spray can drift with the wind or be evaporated and dispersed, potentially landing on the grapevines in nearby vineyards. Even tiny amounts one hundred times lower than the recommended application of these herbicides can cause injury to grapes.

Some studies show vineyards several miles away from the application site can be affected. Vines can be injured, deformed or even die.

“The issue is that grapes, in particular, are very sensitive to growth regulator herbicides,” said Jed Colquhoun, UW–Madison horticulture professor. “So it only takes a very low dose to cause damage and … that can be quite expensive when it does happen.”

These types of herbicides have been used for a long time, and Colquhoun said this is a not a new problem.

“Herbicides are used very commonly across the landscape and in crop production, and the cases of drift are very, very rare,” he said. “The issue is that grapes, in particular, are very sensitive to growth regulator herbicides.”

But Prellwitz said with the growing number of specialty crops in Wisconsin, including grapes, the chance for drift damage is increasing. “I would expect the number of incidences to increase over time unless there’s something done on the state level to eliminate some of the issues that could be potentially caused by drift,” he said.

Scientists in the industry do not dispute the well-documented side effects of herbicidal sprays.

“The symptoms are very clear,” said John Jachetta, a crop scientist who until his retirement in July worked in regulatory and government affairs at Dow AgroSciences, a leading herbicide producer. “It’s difficult to mistake this for other things.”

Lee Van Wychen, director of science policy at the the Weed Science Society of America, an industry group, agreed that the symptoms grapes exhibit when they are exposed to these herbicides is hard to mistake.

He said while other pesticides and herbicides can sometimes impact sensitive crops like grapes, “If there’s a case that occurs with 2,4-D or dicamba ... it would be much easier to come to the conclusion that there was spray drift damage.”

As a grape expert, Reith-Rozelle hears complaints regularly from Wisconsin farmers who are experiencing what they perceive to be a crisis.

“The anxiety is still very high,” she said. ”It’s a big concern wherever corn and soybeans are grown.”

However, Bob Oleson, executive director of the Wisconsin Corn Grower’s Association, said he has not heard any complaints of drift impacting vineyards or other specialty crops and said it is not an issue for corn growers.

“They just don’t plant them [vineyards] next to corn fields so there isn’t the possibility of drift. Furthermore, with the modern technology we’re just not seeing instances of drift we saw many, many years ago.”

The human impact

The problem of chemical drift onto grape farms has even led to litigation.

In 2007, Ted Kearns, owner of Bauer–Kearns Winery in the Town of Belmont, won a civil case against a nearby grain producer. The case was settled in Lafayette County Circuit Court for about $150,000, according to Kearns’ lawyer, Ted Warpinski.

A few years earlier, a farm pasture at nearby Spensley Grain was sprayed with RangeStar, a combination of 2,4-D and dicamba, that drifted on the wind and volatilized in the air, eventually landing on Kearns’ grapes and causing them to die.

Kearns said he first noticed the problem one morning in 2004. The leaves on his grape vines had shriveled up and changed colors. The crop was ruined.

“I cried — I actually cried,” said Kearns, a Vietnam veteran who said starting a vineyard was his dream. “I spent 12 hours a day, seven days a week for 12 years on this vineyard and winery, trying to make it work.”

Kearns, a political conservative with an “I Stand With Walker” sign on his door, said he has had drift damage six out of the past nine years and is contemplating additional litigation. Now, he hopes to sell the property he bought 14 years ago but fears it has lost a lot of its value.

Meantime, he said all he can do is hope that the neighboring farms use the herbicides according to the label on the products.

“If I don’t get a crop this year,” said Kearns, “I’m going to have to go out of business.”

The label is the law

Farmers who use commercial herbicides are required by law to follow the label on those products. But that may not be as simple as it sounds.

The label for Roundup Ready, a popular herbicide for agricultural use made by Monsanto, is complex. In order to meet regulations set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, applicators must consider a variety of weather conditions and use a particular kind of nozzle when spraying.

The 13-page label requires farmers to apply the chemical several times for it be effective, avoid trees, vines, citrus fruit, nuts, olives and vineyards and avoid spraying during times of humidity and heat, along with an array of other specifications.

Reith-Rozelle said those requirements are complex and hard for farmers to follow.

“The farmers may go out when the temperature is a little too hot and the wind is blowing more than the allowed limit per hour [8 to 10 mph] and sometimes they’ll spray because they don’t have other options,” she said.

She added that farmers are not the only herbicide applicators to blame — vineyards located near residential areas are also subject to drift from chemicals used on lawns and golf courses.

DATCP often can do little to enforce the law when it comes to herbicidal drift because the origin of the drift is hard to track, especially if it volatilizes rather than being carried by the wind, Gilson said. The agency can ask local prosecutors to issue fines or criminal charges against those violating label directions. DATCP also can put restrictions on their licenses to apply herbicides.

“The label is the law,” said Gilson. “You are expected to follow that label and you’re responsible for following that label.”

UW–Extension offers an annual applicator training program for farmers, commercial and private herbicide applicators.
Legislation sought

Ultimately, that puts the responsibility of detecting potentially damaging herbicide use into the hands of those who may be affected.

“If you see damage, or you see practices that you think are likely to lead to damage or threaten it, report it to us,” said Gilson. “We will check it out.”

But Kearns said the reason he has had so many incidents of damage is that “People will not comply with the law, and the state will not force them to.”

Gilson said DATCP has investigated 58 complaints involving alleged drift between 2007 and 2011, the most recent year for which data are available. In nearly every case, applicators were issued at least a warning. In 33 cases, a civil complaint was filed, and there was one criminal complaint.

At the request of the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism, Prellwitz recently asked members of the Grape Growers Association whether they had problems with herbicidal drift. Nine producers quickly emailed him back stories of damaged crops.

Vineyard manager Bruce Reeve of Wollersheim Winery in Prairie du Sac said he used to have problems with herbicidal drift, but “We have not had any instances in the last few years because we have talked to our neighbors and educated them about the hazard of drift on grapes.”

Prellwitz said his group plans to seek further restrictions on herbicide use, possibly through new legislation. Its goal is to “restrict some of the uses of different chemicals around vineyards and around specialty crops around the state,” he said.

Kearns is pessimistic.

“I probably won’t see it to the end because I’m 74 and my health is gone,” Kearns said. “I gave it all away on this place.”

The nonprofit Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org) collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW–Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW–Madison or any of its affiliates.

Pasture walk focuses on profitability of bird-friendly grazing
In the Driftless
Ashley Steinke speaks at Rod Ofte's farm
ASHLEY STEINKE, Audubon Great Lakes’ Grassland Ecologist, discusses the efforts grazier Rod Ofte has made on his farm to foster a bird-friendly environment.

DRIFTLESS - Great River Graziers (GRG) held a pasture walk on the farm of rural Coon Valley grassfed beef producer Rod Ofte. The June 3 event was held despite the heavy rain that had fallen in the Driftless Region that day, and was designed to highlight the profitability of bird-friendly grassfed animal agriculture.

Ofte is an old-hand at grassfed production, and general manager of the Wisconsin Grass-fed Beef Cooperative. In recent years, Ofte has undertaken measures in his pastures to make his operation more bird friendly, and based on the number of birds viewed or heard on his farm, is realizing success. Audubon Great Lakes Grassland Ecologist Ashley Steinke attended the event.

The pasture walk drew participants from counties across the Driftless Region, as well as the neighboring states of Iowa and Minnesota. The event, according to GRG coordinator Amy Fenn, was sponsored by Sand County Foundation, Audubon Society, Grassworks, Wisconsin Grass-fed Beef Cooperative, Crawford Stewardship Project. Some of the funding for the event came from USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).

“It's great to see everybody even with all the rain,” GRG’s Vance Haugen told the group gathered in Ofte’s barn. “We're going to divide you folks in half, and half of go on the wagon right away, and we’ll be talking about bird-friendly grassfed production to the other half that stays here.”

Bird-friendly

Haugen pointed participants to a publication written by his friend and colleague Laura Paine 25 years ago. It provides a detailed explanation of how to foster a bird-friendly environment within a grassfed production system. He said he’d reached out to Laura before the event to ask what the one thing was that she would want event participants to understand.

The publication can be downloaded from the internet at University of Wisconsin-Extension, SKU A3715. The name of the report is, ‘Grassland Birds: Fostering Habitats Using Rotational Grazing.’

“Laura said, first, think about concrete,” Haugen recounted. “Then, she said, that the next level of unfriendliness to birds, is corn and soybeans. She said you're not going to be bird friendly with crop farming. Then, she said the next thing that's just a little bit better is the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), still not good, but it's better. It's supposed to help wildlife. It does help. It helps it more than what concrete and row crops do, but because of what is allowed to be planted, unless you plant an expensive bird friendly CRP, it's garbage. And then you can go up to rotationally grazed, and that's one of the best if you're looking at some economic things, but it has to be done correctly. And then, the cream of the cream is a diverse wildlife area that has burning and grazing and other things. So that would be the continuum that she wanted to talk about.”

Management changes

Haugen emphasized that profitable, grassfed, bird-friendly production can be relatively economically benign, and works wonderfully. Haugen asked producers present what they are doing on their farms to make their operations more bird-friendly.

Responses ranged from converting row crop land to pasture, establishing a lightly-grazed, native warm season prairie, splitting up pastures to allow more time for the grasses to rest and grow, establishing refuge areas within pastured areas with flash grazing, and putting in farm ponds surrounded by refuge areas.

“The idea that you totally exclude animals, the idea was that then you would have a paradise, right?” Haugen commented. “If you look at some CRP where that was done, was that correct? No, it was absolutely terrible. So, the idea is that you should have some disturbance, and you can do that in different ways, but flash grazing is a real nice way to do it.”

Haugen explained that ‘flash grazing’ an area means you bring in a huge amount of cattle into an area, let them graze everything down, and then have a very, very long rest period.

 “So the stuff might be 20-30, maybe even 40 inches tall. You bring in the cattle, and you wham it down to maybe three, four inches. But then you might have 90 or even120 days of rest, and it does tremendous things. Cattle are a wonderful thing, and fire is a good thing, done correctly. Done correctly, the mixture of those two things does some tremendous stuff for our birds and for our grazing.”

Grazing and streams

Haugen also recounted the history in the state of allowing grazing on the banks of streams. He put forth the proposition that eliminating trees in riparian areas (on the banks of streams), and having grass grow right down to the streambank, is better for the stream.

“Many folks here can remember in the 80s when the Wisconsin State Legislature tried to ban grazing near streams,” Haugen said. “How many people here know personally streams and creeks where grazing has gone away, and has the stream improved? Or has it degraded? Well, in most cases, it is degraded, and the reason for that is that trees have very large roots, and they don't hold the soil very well, and they fall over, and they can cause all kinds of different things. So if we can have grass growing right down to the edge of the water, you're going to have a lot better stream. “

Haugen posed the question, “doing these bird-friendly things on your farm – will it detract from your bottom line?”

“The answer is not necessarily. “One of the studies we cite in the information provided to participants today demonstrates that its possible to both increase production on your acres, and increase habitat for birds and other wildlife.”

Vance Haugen speaks at Rod Ofte's farm
EMINENT GRAZING authority, Vance Haugen, discusses profitable, bird-friendly agriculture with participants at a pasture walk on Rod Ofte’s farm in rural Coon Valley.

Soil health

Haugen also touched on the growing practice of using cover crops to increase soil health and prevent erosion. One of the most common, winter-hardy cover crops planted in northern regions is cereal rye.

“When you terminate the rye, let it go to at least 12 inches,” Haugen advised. “The soil is a living thing. It has mycorrhizal fungi, and micro and macro insects. All of those things have to be fed. And if you think about it as a solar collector, what happens is that the plants take the sunlight, convert it into carbohydrates and other things which go to the roots. And the roots have exudates that the plant uses. So, it's a symbiotic relationship.”

Haugen talked about a billboard he sees along the highway enroute to Minneapolis. The billboard says, ‘Don’t Farm Naked – Plant Cover Crops.’

“What they're talking about is that you're never supposed to have bare soil - you're supposed to have something green on it all the time,” Haugen explained. “And when we're grazing and we've got grass, there's always something that's growing. And under the soil there’s always things working. It might get real, real cold, and some of it will freeze, but there's always some living things, and we feed those living things with that living cover.”

 Haugen explained that new data is showing that as the soils get more exudates and more diversity, you can actually grow more tonnage with less inputs.

“It takes a while, and it's not overnight, but it is measurable, and it is becoming substantial for some of the folks who've been doing it for 20 and 30 years,” Haugen said. “So in the short term, you got to pay the banker, but in the long term, we can make money by grazing. So, we can be tree-friendly, we can be bird-friendly, fish-friendly, and mycorrhiza-friendly, and it can all benefit us.”

Haugen emphasized that rotational grazing can get a lot of benefits for wildlife, for the environment, for people, but it is not a natural system. He said rotational grazing mimics nature, but not perfectly.

“So we do the best we can, trying to incorporate having the outcomes that we want to have with the biological systems that we have to work with,” Haugen explained. “Just this morning, Laura Paine said the word she really wants everybody to think about, whether you're taking a look at your grazing, whether you're taking a look at your bird friendliness, whether you're taking a look at your soil health issues, is to think about optimizing things rather than making it the best.”

“So, sometimes we might have to get by with just a little bit less, maybe pounds of beef per acre, but we want to have those birds over here, or whatever,” Haugen explained. “So you have to think about optimizing, and sometimes that means that we have to compromise some of the things, but that doesn't mean that we give up on any of our goals. So if anything else, think about optimizing what you have going on. And as far as making it possible to be bird friendly, you can be bird friendly, maybe not to every bird, but to many birds.”