By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Bridgeport water issues prompt lawsuit
Courthouse PdC

PRAIRIE DU CHIEN - Sometimes you want water on your property and sometimes you don’t—a lawsuit filed by Crossing Rivers Health against the Town of Bridgeport and nine other defendants is definitely about not wanting water on you property.

The Crossing Rivers Health, the hospital and clinics located along Highway 18 near Wal-Mart in the Town of Bridgeport, filed the lawsuit claiming what they refer to as ‘water trespass’ in Crawford County Circuit Court on February 21. The lawsuit alleges that a Town of Bridgeport road improvement project on Vineyard Road has made unusable 50 of the 105 acres owned by Crossing Rivers Health.

The suit claims upgrading a 30-inch tube that drained storm water from the north side of the road onto the south side of the road is the problem. The Crossing Rivers’ property is on the south side of Vineyard Road. As part of the road  improvement project, the tube was replaced by a box culvert 16-feet long and four-feet high. 

As a result of the of the constructed box culvert, water flow increased from 100 gallons per second to 6,657 gallons per second, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit complaint also explains that a berm in the north side ditch meant that once water backed up in the tube it would spill north over the berm and be contained on the property on the north side of Vineyard Road owned by Mike Steiner. Steiner is a Town of Bridgeport Supervisor.

Following completion of the project, all surface and storm water that previously flowed north onto Steiner’s property now flows south ‘trespassing’ onto the plaintiff’s property, according to Crossing Rivers.

Crossing Rivers gave notice of its claim and petition of relief at the Town of Bridgeport meeting on June 13, 2018.

The Town of Bridgeport Board met in a closed session at an October meeting with their hired MSA consultants to discuss the matter. When the board returned to open session, they moved to comply with the town’s obligation to abate and remediate the water damage. The motion passed with Bridgeport Town Supervisor Mike Steiner abstaining.

To date, the Town of Bridgeport has not moved to remediate and has not corrected the situation, according to the lawsuit.

In addition to the Town of Bridgeport, the Crossing Rivers lawsuit names nine other defendants. Those defendants include John Karnopp, Bridgeport Town Chairperson; Michael Steiner, a Town of Bridgeport Supervisor and the owner of property adjoining the Crossing Rivers’ property; Alan Flansburgh, a Town of Bridgeport Supervisor; Crawford County; the Crawford County Highway Department; Dennis Pelock, the Crawford County Highway Commissioner; Travis J. Kramer owner of Kramer Consulting Group–a Wauzeka-based surveying company, TEAM Engineering, a Loganville-based engineering firm; and H. James and Sons, a Fennimore-based road construction firm.

Crossing Rivers CEO Bill Sexton explained that looking at the costly remediation that may be necessary to correct the water trespass situation, it was decided that all affected parties should be named in the lawsuit to help share in the expense of the remediation.

Sexton said the hospital was interested in collaborating with all parties involved to find a resolution to the water problem.

“We’re not interested in anything other than getting the water off the property,” Sexton. 

The lawsuit called the 50 acres of the property now subject to flooding a breeding ground for waterfowl, vermin, algae and mosquitos.

Sexton indicated he was unsure what would happen with the lawsuit going forward. He noted the defendants had 45 days after being notified of the suit to make a response.

“A lot depends on their response,” the CEO noted. “We’re optimistic that we can rectify this by working together. It’s a lot of acreage that we can no longer use to our benefit.” 

Crossing Rivers is a health care facility that serves four counties. The plans are to develop a health care campus on the 105-acre site that would include more buildings and other facilities in the future.

Sexton noted that in addition to the Steiner property, a subdivision located to the north of the Crossing Rivers’ property is also now draining on to the hospital’s property.

“What we’d really like to do is get the water off of our property,” Sexton said.

Sasha Dull, Crossing Rivers Chief Development Officer and External Relations Coordinator, was quick to add that Crossing Rivers did not want a solution to the water on their property to adversely affect other property owners. 

“We need a co-operative effort,” Dull said.

Of the defendants contacted none chose to comment on the situation and others declined to return phone messages left seeking comment on the situation.

Hearings set for Badger Hollow Wind Farm permit
Madison June 17, Linden June 24
Badger Hollow map
The proposed Badger Hollow Wind Farm would be near Livingston.

The developers of the proposed Badger Hollow Wind Farm near Livingston will argue their case for approval from the state Public Service Commission later this year.

The hearings on Badger Hollow’s Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity application will be held in Madison June 17 and in Linden June 24.

The proposed 118-megawatt wind farm to be built by Invenergy of Chicago would feature 19 wind turbines 574 to 656 feet tall in the Grant County towns of Clifton and Wingville and the Iowa County towns of Eden, Linden and Mifflin, connected by a 345,000-volt tie line, with an additional collector station.

The turbines would be located in a jagged line from east of Cobb to south of Cobb to the American Transmission Co. Hill Valley substation in Montfort, then south past Livingston to northeast of Rewey. The Hill Valley substation is part of the Cardinal–Hickory Creek power transmission line project.

The PSC sent a letter April 11 saying that PSC and state Department of Natural Resources found in a joint environmental review that “no significant impacts on the human or natural environment are likely to occur because of the construction or operation of this project.”

The PSC/DNR determination means the agencies will not do an Environmental Impact Statement, a more detailed environmental review.

The PSC letter said the turbines would produce no more than 44 decibels f sound, below the PSC noise standards of 50 decibels during the day and 45 decibels at night.

The PSC letter said blade flicker, which “some individuals may feel extremely affected while others experience little distraction,” would be expected for 29 hours 47 minutes per year. The letter says the developer is “willing to evaluate options such as vegetative buffers, blinds, and/or turbine curtailment to reduce shadow flicker” if mitigation is needed, including for “non-participating residences or occupied community buildings that receive more than 20 hours of shadow flicker per year.”

The letter said the project is “not expected to have a significant impact on rare species during the construction or operational phase,” including on bats and birds.

The PSC letter said the project would “affect the aesthetics of the area for as long as it is in operation which may be looked at favorably or unfavorably depending on the viewer.”

The deadline for public comment on the environmental review was May 2. One person who commented was Gina Metelica of Platteville, who said the Driftless Region and its sensitive karst geology should not “become a Sacrifice Zone.”

Metelica said in testimony to the PSC that wind farm projects were put on hold in two other areas with karst geology — the Timberwolf Wind Project in Fillmore County, Minn., which was supposed to become operational in 2023, and the Republic Wind Farm in Ohio, which was canceled after 27 of 47 wind turbines were to be located on “areas exhibiting karst features.”

Metelica said the vibrations from wind turbines in karst areas “can accelerate the collapse of sinkholes and impact ground water flow. Construction activities such as driving piles for turbine foundations can generate higher vibration levels which can impact groundwater flow to surrounding wells or the water quality,” including in areas with abandoned lead and zinc mines.

The PSC’s Madison hearing on Badger Hollow will be held in the Hill Farm State Office Building, 4822 Madison Yards Way, Tuesday, June 17 at 10 a.m.

The PSC then will hold a public hearing at the Village of Linden Community Building, 460 Main St., Tuesday, June 24 at 2 and 6 p.m.

Both meetings will be able to be viewed on Zoom at https://us02web.zoom.us/my/pschearings. The meeting will also be shown at www.youtube.com/@PSCWI-Hearings. Those who can’t access the internet will be able to access the meeting audio by calling 312-626-6799 and entering meeting ID 809-513-2930.

The PSC meeting notice says that due to “technical limitations at the Linden hearing location” Zoom may not be able to be used. A notice on Zoom in Linden will be posted at https://apps.psc.wi.gov/apps/Calendar/External/HearingDetails/55.

Comments may also be written by June 26 at https://apps.psc.wi.gov/pages/publicCommentCase.htm?util=9827&case=CF&num=100. or mailed to Docket 9827-CE-100 Comments, Public Service Commission, P.O. Box 7854, Madison, WI 53707-7854.

The proposed Badger Hollow Wind Farm is east of Red Barn, built by Allete Clean Energy of Duluth, Minn., which has 28 turbines producing 92 megawatts. The wind farm is 90 percent owned by Wisconsin Public Service Corp. of Green Bay and 10 percent owned by Madison Gas & Electric.

Red Barn, which began operation in 2023, has been the source of complaints including health effects. The blade of a Red Barn turbine separated from its hub on Annaton Road west of Livingston last September. Two other Red Barn turbines have flaws in blades.

The Badger Hollow project is one of four proposed for this area.

The largest proposed area wind farm is Pattern Energy’s Uplands Wind project, with a map submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration in April that showed 181 possible locations for wind turbines in the 600-megawatt $1 billion project. According to the FAA map three wind turbine locations are immediately west of the Platte Mound and two are south of the Mound between Lafayette County B and U.S. 151. Other locations are near Belmont Mound State Park.

Allete proposed building the Whitetail Wind project in the Town of Clifton, which would install 21 2- to 4.2-megawatt wind turbines to generate 70 megawatts of power east of Red Barn. However, Allete sold the project to Invenergy, the builder of the Badger Hollow Solar Farm east of Montfort, which proposing building the Badger Hollow Wind Farm near the solar project.

Allete’s PSC application lists the towers as 410 to 650 feet tall from ground to the tip of the top blade, with rotor diameter of up to 492 feet. The application said Whitetail Wind is negotiating with a wind turbine supplier “and will confirm the final number and model(s) of turbines” for the project when negotiations conclude.

Allete’s Whitetail Wind application said it has “formal leases/easements” with landowners for more than 5,000 acres in the 12,793-acre project site.

Seven turbines are slated to be located on Wisconsin 80, five on Rock Church Road, four on Grant County E, two on Old 80 Road, one on New California Road, one on Hickory Grove, and one off Hopewell Road, according to the application. Two meteorological towers also would be built on four locations — two off County E, one north of Crow Branch Lane and one west of 80 just south of the north Livingston village limits.

Whitetail Wind does not require a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the PSC because the project is smaller than 100 megawatts, according to the application.

Liberty Utilities, a subsidiary of a Canadian utility, is proposing a 30- to 40-turbine project, with turbines up to 656 feet tall, to generate 200 megawatts of electricity in western Grant County. The proposed project area is south of U.S. 18 west of Wisconsin 133 and along Wisconsin 35/133 and generally west of Grant County J.