By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Organizations announce intent to pursue conservation and profitable farming
Orgs support conservation profitable farming

WISCONSIN - On the Winter Solstice, December 21, four organizations issued a joint announcement about a partnership to protect clean water and thriving farms. Those organizations are Clean Wisconsin, the Dairy Business Association, the Nature Conservancy, and Wisconsin Land+Water.

The announcement was signed by Mark Redsten, president and CEO of Clean Wisconsin; Tom Crave, president of the Dairy Business Association; Elizabeth A. Koehler, state director of The Nature Conservancy in Wisconsin; and Bob Micheel, president of Wisconsin Land+Water.

The announcement stated:

 “We believe the current programs to permit farms and manage unintended agricultural runoff are in need of change. Together, our state must also invest more resources in helping people who don’t have access to clean water get it and in helping farmers grow our food with fewer negative environmental impacts. We need to support and encourage innovative farming practices and new cropping systems that improve farmers’ bottom lines and the environment.”

According to Wisconsin Land+Water president, Bob Micheel, the group had been working together behind the scenes for some time leading up to the joint announcement.

“Encouraging the state legislature to take up the bills that came out of the Speaker’s Task Force on Water Quality and were passed by the Assembly will be our first order of business,” Micheel said. “As a result of delays related to COVID-19, and the Senate’s refusal to take up the bills, we’re going to have to start over on this.”

  The announcement further stated:

“We live in challenging times, and these days it can feel like we disagree more often than not. There are, however, at least two things that most, if not all, of us can agree on — keeping our water clean and our farms successful. To achieve both here in Wisconsin, we need to do more than agree they are important. We need bold action.”

Micheel also pointed to the recently released Governor’s Task Force on Climate Change (TFCC) report as a catalyst to the organization’s decision to join together.

“If you look at the section of the report dedicated to agriculture, you’ll see that all of the recommendations deal with land conservation,” Micheel said. “Climate change is impacting everything, and farmers are being impacted severely. Farmers also have great potential to be a part of the solution.”

In addition, Micheel explained that going forward, when county land conservation departments are crafting their five-year plans, climate change mitigation will be a required part of it.

“Wisconsin Land+Water will be asking counties about whether the impacts of climate change have been recognized in their counties,” Micheel explained. “The challenge will then be to make plans for how each county can help to mitigate the impacts, whether through flood monitoring or other strategies to adapt to increasingly larger storm events.”

The introduction to the agriculture section of the TFCC report states: 

“Globally, soils store two to three times more CO2 than the atmosphere and two to five times more carbon than is stored in vegetation. How we manage this carbon pool can have significant impacts on climate change. With nearly 900 million acres of agricultural land in the U.S., there is an enormous opportunity to rebuild soil organic carbon, sequester atmospheric carbon, and reduce CH4 (methane) and N2O (nitrous oxide) emissions. Some estimates suggest that if the U.S. were able to adequately address economic, social, and technical barriers to implementing soil management best practices, U.S. croplands have the potential to sequester 1.5–5.0 billion metric tons of CO2e per year for 20 years. (CO2e, or carbon dioxide equivalent, is a standard unit for measuring carbon footprints. The idea is to express the impact of each different greenhouse gas in terms of the amount of CO2 that would create the same amount of warming.)

The same agronomic practices that increase carbon sequestration also can help mitigate flood events, protect water quality, recharge groundwater, and increase resilience to drought. Recognizing the societal importance of food production, land managers and policymakers must strive to balance the protection of ecosystems for climate mitigation and other environmental co-benefits with the need to optimize agricultural management to feed a growing world population. The state of Wisconsin is a critical piece of this puzzle.”

The report provides four recommendations for agriculture’s role in slowing and reversing climate change:

• Support farmer-led watershed groups

• Pay farmers to increase soil carbon storage in agricultural and working lands. 

• Avoid conversion of natural working lands

• Make managed grazing livestock production systems an agricultural priority

The joint announcement ended with a discussion of the role that farms can play in helping to solve some of the state’s most pressing issues.

“It’s time to rethink how we protect our water and support our farms,” the announcement stated. 

“We can work toward a permitting process that supports farms that are meeting water quality standards, and we need to realize a future where every farm in the state is meeting a minimum set of conservation standards. We also recognize that in some sensitive parts of the state, farming practices will have to change more dramatically in order to protect our water resources, and our state needs to help those farmers adapt. 

“We must invest in Wisconsin farmers and Wisconsin’s drinking water. It won’t be easy, and it won’t be free, but the results will be worth every penny. We need to support our farmers who already recognize clean water is good business and help others adjust their practices to better protect our water. Every resident in Wisconsin has a right to clean water; if they don’t have it, we have an obligation as a state to help them get it. 

“We cannot address clean water or the future of farming in Wisconsin as standalone issues; they are challenges that must be met together. Too often, policy disagreements have resulted in conflict and inaction instead of compromises and improvements. Our organizations are prepared to find common ground, to request bold changes from decision-makers, and to work toward a future where our state has clean water and a thriving agricultural community.”
Watershed Council collaborates with Gays Mills around sewer plant challenges
Tainter Creek
layout
TAINTER CREEK Watershed Council is partnering with the Village of Gays Mills to facilitate conservation practice installation upstream of the village’s Waste Water Treatment Facility. The newly reinvigorated watershed council now pulls from the greater Tainter Creek Watershed, which includes four subwatersheds.

The Tainter Creek Watershed Council (TCWC) assembled about 10 members for a meeting with Gays Mills Village President Harry Heisz and Village Trustee Ethan Eitsert from the Gays Mills Village Board on Wednesday, May 7. The subject of the meeting was how the farmers and rural landowners in the watershed could help the village with conservation practices that could buy the village time to plan for replacement of the Waste Water Treatment Facility (WWTF).

“It’s not just about the village – we also want to make this work to improve the creek,” Harry Heisz said. “WDNR has ultimately said we have to relocate our WWTF away from the banks of the Kickapoo River, but the village is grappling with the costs of that. In the meantime, while we plan, we are looking to offset the very low phosphorous in effluent requirements of the state and the federal government through partnering with farmers and rural landowners on conservation practices that can measurably reduce phosphorous in the Kickapoo River.”

Heisz explained that the village would pursue loans and grants to pay for the practice installations in order to buy time and avoid costly WDNR fines.

The Village of Soldiers Grove at their May meeting approved upgrades to their WWTF which, if grant  and low-interest loan funding is approved, will result in an increase of residential sewer rates (average of $580 per year per user) by between $100 to $200 per month in order to meet state and federal requirements.

“To meet WDNR’s phosphorous requirements would cost the village $3 million if we don’t pursue these conservation projects,” village trustee Ethan Eitsert commented.

TCWC grazing project

Longtime TCWC member Chuck Bolstad weighed in on the topic.

“TCWC, through a portfolio of projects like cover crops and our Pasture Project, undertaken partnership with the Wallace Center Pasture Project, and using $1.15 million in funding from U.S. EPA’s Gulf of Mexico Division Farmer to Farmer Program, has already lowered phosphorous in Tainter Creek,” Bolstad said proudly. “We have a proven track record, supported by years of water quality monitoring in the creek.”

Locally, the Grazing Project program was implemented by Valley Stewardship Network (VSN), with technical support from two experienced local grazers – Jim Munsch of Coon Valley and Dennis Rooney of Steuben. Former VSN employees Dani Heisler and Monique Hassman worked extensively on the program, coordinating with farmer participants and Munsch and Rooney, creating maps to support the project, and more.

“We blew our initial goals out of the water with this project, and it has been a wild success,” Dani Heisler (now the DATCP Producer-Led Program Manager) told the group. “Through this project in the Tainter Creek Watershed, we achieved 135 percent of our goal for reduction of phosphorous leaving fields in the watershed, and 170 percent of our goal for reduction of sediment leaving fields in the watershed.”

Heisler said this meant that phosphorous leaving farm fields in the watershed each year is reduced by 2,300 pounds (initial goal was 1,700 pounds). Reduction of sediment leaving fields in the watershed each year as a result of the project is reduced by an estimated 1,600 tons (initial goal was 940 tons).

Need the points

“We know we have to get the points, and we’ve just applied for another five-year waiver from WDNR,” Heisz said. “By the end of five years, if we receive the waiver, we hope to have a new waste water treatment plant.”

Heisz said that any eligible project would have to be documented by soil samples – before and after.

One of TCWC’s founding farmers Grant Rudrud, asked Heisz where the conservation practice installations could occur and still be eligible. Heisz responded that anything upstream of the sewer plant, and below any other WWTF would be eligible.

TCWC member from the Trout Creek Subwatershed, Monique Hassman, asked who is responsible for maintenance and repair if the project is damaged?

“The village has to maintain it and repair it if it is damaged,” Heisz responded. “We will also have to have access on an ongoing basis for maintenance, and for soil sampling.”

TCWC member from rural Soldiers Grove, grassfed beef farmer Bruce Ristow, shared several prospects with landowners he had identified.

TCWC farmer member Jesse Blum shared that fixing sinkholes and ditches could be a good avenue, that would meet the village’s needs and also meet the needs of farmers.

“It doesn’t have to be right on the creek,” Heisz responded. “I think putting in some small dams (farm ponds) could be a good option, and could help with the village’s flooding problems as well.”

Heisz summed up saying, “the next step is to meet with the landowners with the representative of our engineering firm present.”

The Tainter Creek Watershed Council is planning another meeting in June at the Kickapoo Orchard.

At their March 18 meeting, held in Readstown, the group attracted over 65 participants. This drew from the newly-expanded boundaries of the watershed to include four subwatersheds – Tainter Creek, Reads Creek, Trout Creek, and Kickapoo River/Caswell Hollow in Gays Mills. The area now includes the municipalities of Readstown, Soldiers Grove, Gays Mills and Mt. Sterling. Look for more information coming soon about this dynamic group.