By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
City council has mixed feelings about planned demolition of pump house
PumpHouseBIG
DARLINGTONS PUMP HOUSE, located on W. River St. is set for demolition. The pump house was built in the 1880s.

At the meeting of the common council of the city of Darlington that was held on May 7, council members voted to tear down the old city pump house that is located on West River Street.
    The decision was the result of a recommendation from the property and insurance committee, which recommended that the building be demolished and the well abandoned. A portion of the back wall of the building is to be left as a historical marker with a plaque of some type to commemorate the historical significance of the building and site. The cost for the demolition project will be taken out of the water department budget.
    After demolition it is planned for some of the bricks from the building to be placed behind the city garage to be available for pickup by anyone interested in acquiring them.
    The pump house was built in the 1880s in order to pump water to the water reservoir on Summit Avenue for the entire city. The property contains the original city well. For more history on the pump house see this week’s Sleepwalking on pg. 8.
    Currently the building houses some salvage items, which would be sold for scrap in order to offset the cost of demolition.
    At the meeting of the common council of the city of Darlington that was held on Tuesday, May 21 Alderperson Don Osterday again brought up the planned demolition of the pump house, saying that when he passes by the old building he regrets voting to tear it down.
    “Maybe the decision we made was the right one,” he said, “but I just hope we don’t move too quickly.” Osterday brought up the historical significance of the building and said that many people he spoke to about the topic expressed concern with the proposed demolition.
    However, several other members of the council pointed out that the building currently serves no purpose and is in need of repairs, the funding of which would not be cheap.
    According to public works director, Jeremy Williams, the roof needs to be replaced as well as sections of the wall, which have been damaged and now allow various creatures access to the building.
    In 2012, Brunkow Construction provided an estimated cost of approximately $25,000 to replace the roof and repair sections of the wall, according to Williams.
    The council as a whole seemed to be of the same mind as Osterday as far as regretting the loss of such a historical building, but no one could supply another solution that would preserve the building properly as well as supply the necessary funding.
    “I tried to save [the building] years ago,” said Alderperson Bev Anderson during the discussion. She indicated, however that nothing much ever came of the effort.

Village must meet phosphorous levels or find alternative
Gays Mills
gays mills village board

The Village of Gays Mills Board received a report on the status of the Wastewater Treatment Project from Evan Chambers, a project engineer at Town and Country Engineering.

The proposed new Wastewater Treatment Plant to be built in the village is planned, but cannot presently be built because of cost. Town & Country is working with the village to find  funding in grants and loans to build the plant.

While some new treatment plants built in the state can meet the latest very low level of phosphorous discharge required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, others cannot. The treatment plant as proposed for Gays Mills will be a big step forward, but it will not include the filtration equipment to get to the required level.

With or without the completion of the treatment plant, Chambers pointed out the village will need to get credits for projects elsewhere in the area. These can be used as water trading credits to fulfill reducing phosphorous elsewhere to offset the amount the village cannot achieve at the current or future plant.

The village is seeking to renew its five-year variance with the DNR by using water trading credits from other projects it funds upstream from the plant.

Chambers Told the board they needed to sign up some new projects that might include rip-rapping streambanks to prevent soil erosion carrying phosphorous into the stream. Calculation of soil erosion reductions would show how much phosphorous is being kept out of the river and ultimately the village would get credit for reducing phosphorus with project to offset what is exceeding the current limit.

Chambers told the board he had soil sample lined up with potential partner and would know more soon.

“The village will need partnerships no matter what,” Chambers said.

Village trustees Art Winsor and Kevin Murray expressed concern that the partnerships would be a workable solution.

Winsor questioned, if figures obtained for the credits needed to comply with the lower phosphorus level requirements, were accurate. The trustee asked if was possible to overshoot with some sort of treatment and get more credits than needed.

Chambers explained, in the event that happened, the village could trade the extra phosphorus to another municipality that needed it.

Murray noted that the plant is no closer to being built than it was before the plant was created. He pointed out the cost of building the plant has skyrocketed year after.

In answer to a question, Chambers said the current cost to build the new sewer plant as designed is estimated to be $13 million and the village could not do it without getting 70% of cost financed by grants.

“You can’t get there without grant,” Chamber the engineer also noted that grant funding has dried up.

The variance the water trading credits obtain for the village keeps it going. Chambers said the village can’t afford to not get a variance and be found out of compliance and face large fines.

“We’re getting good results with what we’re doing,” Chamber told the board.

After some discussion trustee Larry McCarn made a motion to approve the Town & Country’s Scope of Service for the Final Phosphorous Report and Pollutant Minimization Plan. Winsor seconded the motion and the board passed the motion.

In other business, the Gays Mills Village Board:

 • approved Mara O’Brien as new lifeguard at the pool and learned the pool lost the services of two other lifeguards

• learned that Ray and Danielle Strong, the pool directors, will be available to serve as life guards

• heard that the plan is to open the pool on Saturday, June 7

• learned that the building inspector has been contacted to report on the nuisance properties at 200 Main Street and 208 Main Street

• approved a temporary Alcohol License for wine and beer for the Friends of Gays Mills for May 16 at the Community Commerce Center for the Alice in Dairyland event

• clarified the sewer hookup fee waive extension would be allowed for all hookups–not just for homeowners, who had filed an application with the village