By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Common Council adopts wheel tax on a close vote
Boscobel
Boscobel City Hall

BOSCOBEL - In a narrow 4-3 vote, Boscobel’s City Council voted in favor of a “wheel tax” at their June 6 meeting. The new ordinance would charge $10 per vehicle registration, over and above state fees. 

According to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 2,532 vehicles were registered in Boscobel at the end of 2021 that would have been subject to the new tax. That amounts to about 40 percent of the city’s street maintenance budget, according to City Administrator Misty Molzof. 

A growing trend

Boscobel is not alone. Wheel taxes are one of the only revenue sources in Wisconsin that remain under local control, and municipalities are adopting them at a rapid pace. 

In 2011, only four communities imposed a wheel tax; by February 2022 that number had grown to 44, according to a report released last year by the nonpartisan research organization, Wisconsin Policy Forum. During the same period, local-level wheel tax revenues ballooned from $7.5 million to $62.8 million, driven in part by cities like Milwaukee and Madison, which charge $30 and $40 respectively.

The state raised its fees for vehicle registration to $85 in 2019. Title transfer fees doubled to $165 in the same year. These fees, combined with the gas tax, fund the state transportation budget, which has not kept pace with inflation, according to the report.

Wisconsin’s transportation budget took a further hit during the pandemic. Federal recovery funding may make up some of that difference.

A Madison issue

Wheel taxes are becoming more common for a few reasons. Wisconsin law does not allow municipalities to charge a sales tax, which other states use to offset local costs. And for the past decade, the legislature has made it increasingly difficult for local communities to raise taxes on real estate. 

It’s a complicated picture, but in a nutshell, since 2011, tax hikes have been tied to new construction. The idea, explains Jason Stein, research director at Wisconsin Policy Forum, is that existing property owners don’t see an increase in their tax bill. 

For communities growing slowly, especially in rural areas, that can be a problem. “There’s a concern that you trap slow-growth communities,” Stein said. “They can’t make investments in infrastructure to attract growth. It could in the long run make it hard for communities to break out of that cycle.”

In the meantime, residents still expect the same level of public service—policing, fire prevention, street maintenance, and so on. 

“So where do you get the money, right?” asked Molzof. “How long can you run a marathon with your hands tied together and your feet tied together—before your community suffers?”

Many communities, including Boscobel, turn to fees to make up the difference. Other examples include fire department fees for service, which vary depending on the severity of the fire. 

Roll call

The new ordinance won’t go into effect immediately. It must be approved by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, which generally takes 90 days, according to City Attorney Ben Wood. 

Voting in favor of the ordinance were Roger Brown, Krissy Schneider, Steve Fritz, and Gary Kjos. No votes came from Brian Kendall, Milt Cashman, and Stephanie Brown. Barb Bell was absent.

Other business

The council approved several items on the agenda:

• an ordinance permitting food trucks and other mobile businesses to park on city property

• licenses for liquor, cigarette, pool tables, mobile home parks, and salvage lots

• a street closing for a July 4 party

• hiring pool and summer rec employees

• selling a parcel near the industrial park to Bob Bremmer and Diane Watson for new storage units

• accepting the resignation of Tyler Herman from the street maintenance department

• ratifying a payment of $32,555 for pool painting and one for $212,486 for the water pipe replacement project

• appointments for the Capital Improvements Plan
Village must meet phosphorous levels or find alternative
Gays Mills
gays mills village board

The Village of Gays Mills Board received a report on the status of the Wastewater Treatment Project from Evan Chambers, a project engineer at Town and Country Engineering.

The proposed new Wastewater Treatment Plant to be built in the village is planned, but cannot presently be built because of cost. Town & Country is working with the village to find  funding in grants and loans to build the plant.

While some new treatment plants built in the state can meet the latest very low level of phosphorous discharge required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, others cannot. The treatment plant as proposed for Gays Mills will be a big step forward, but it will not include the filtration equipment to get to the required level.

With or without the completion of the treatment plant, Chambers pointed out the village will need to get credits for projects elsewhere in the area. These can be used as water trading credits to fulfill reducing phosphorous elsewhere to offset the amount the village cannot achieve at the current or future plant.

The village is seeking to renew its five-year variance with the DNR by using water trading credits from other projects it funds upstream from the plant.

Chambers Told the board they needed to sign up some new projects that might include rip-rapping streambanks to prevent soil erosion carrying phosphorous into the stream. Calculation of soil erosion reductions would show how much phosphorous is being kept out of the river and ultimately the village would get credit for reducing phosphorus with project to offset what is exceeding the current limit.

Chambers told the board he had soil sample lined up with potential partner and would know more soon.

“The village will need partnerships no matter what,” Chambers said.

Village trustees Art Winsor and Kevin Murray expressed concern that the partnerships would be a workable solution.

Winsor questioned, if figures obtained for the credits needed to comply with the lower phosphorus level requirements, were accurate. The trustee asked if was possible to overshoot with some sort of treatment and get more credits than needed.

Chambers explained, in the event that happened, the village could trade the extra phosphorus to another municipality that needed it.

Murray noted that the plant is no closer to being built than it was before the plant was created. He pointed out the cost of building the plant has skyrocketed year after.

In answer to a question, Chambers said the current cost to build the new sewer plant as designed is estimated to be $13 million and the village could not do it without getting 70% of cost financed by grants.

“You can’t get there without grant,” Chamber the engineer also noted that grant funding has dried up.

The variance the water trading credits obtain for the village keeps it going. Chambers said the village can’t afford to not get a variance and be found out of compliance and face large fines.

“We’re getting good results with what we’re doing,” Chamber told the board.

After some discussion trustee Larry McCarn made a motion to approve the Town & Country’s Scope of Service for the Final Phosphorous Report and Pollutant Minimization Plan. Winsor seconded the motion and the board passed the motion.

In other business, the Gays Mills Village Board:

 • approved Mara O’Brien as new lifeguard at the pool and learned the pool lost the services of two other lifeguards

• learned that Ray and Danielle Strong, the pool directors, will be available to serve as life guards

• heard that the plan is to open the pool on Saturday, June 7

• learned that the building inspector has been contacted to report on the nuisance properties at 200 Main Street and 208 Main Street

• approved a temporary Alcohol License for wine and beer for the Friends of Gays Mills for May 16 at the Community Commerce Center for the Alice in Dairyland event

• clarified the sewer hookup fee waive extension would be allowed for all hookups–not just for homeowners, who had filed an application with the village