By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Details behind missing radios coming to light
Placeholder Image

Although the controversy over the Soldiers Grove Fire Department’s missing radios and their replacement has been discussed at the last five Soldiers Grove Village Board meetings, most of the facts surrounding the radios disappearance and replacement remain unknown to the public.

In some cases, rumors and a loose rendition of the facts seems to have replaced the real version of events.

The Crawford County Sheriff’s Department’s investigative report, a memorandum from Crawford County District Attorney Tim Baxter concerning that investigation and an interview with Bill Zirk, the owner of D&Z Rescue Products, help to shed some light on a confusing situation. D&Z Rescue sold the replacement radios to the department. Zirk is also a Lieutenant and Treasurer of the Soldiers Grove Volunteer Fire Department.

The loss and subsequent replacement of five portable radios, valued at more than $2,000 each, has raised concerns among village board members, volunteer firefighters and local residents.

It seems most people with knowledge of the situation believe that theft was probably involved in the disappearance of the radios, but who might have stolen them remains unknown at this point.

The situation appears to have started early this year or even the year before, according to the investigative report of Crawford County Sheriff’s Department Lieutenant Wade Hutchison. He indicated in that report that he was contacted by Soldiers Grove Fire Department Lieutenant Bill Zirk on Tuesday, Feb. 5. However, Zirk recalled the date as Tuesday, March 5 in village board meetings last month and in an interview with the Independent-Scout.

Hutchison reported Zirk told him that Soldiers Grove Fire Chief Dave Clason had instructed him to call the sheriff’s department and report seven portable radios and some other equipment missing on Tuesday, Feb. 5, following a fire department meeting on Monday, Feb. 4.

“Lieutenant Zirk offered a nine-month timeframe in which they (the radios) have been either stolen or possibly misplaced,” Hutchison wrote in his report.

Both Hutchison and Crawford County District Attorney Tim Baxter wrote that the missing radios should be viewed as a case of theft.

“At this point, the whereabouts of missing radios is unknown,” wrote Baxter in his memorandum of August 29, which was based on a review and opinion of Hutchison’s report. “You referred the file to  me so that I could review the case for any possible theft charges. Since it seems very strange, if not inconceivable, to me that an entity such as a small fire department could simply ‘misplace’ five very important and very expensive radios, I agree this can, and perhaps should be viewed as a theft case.”

Actually, it’s an opinion shared by Soldiers Grove Fire Department Lieutenant Bill Zirk, who believes the loss of two radio chargers in addition to the radios tends to indicate theft rather than loss through misplacement.

Despite the district attorney’s belief that the radios were probably stolen, he declined to prosecute anyone for their theft.

“At this time, while I do feel that these radios were not simply just misplaced or lost, I do not have the evidence to file theft charges in connection with this matter,” Baxter wrote in his memorandum.

Hutchison reported that when he discussed the matter of suspects in a theft of the radios with Zirk, the fire department lieutenant named Luke Kleiber as a person of interest. Zirk is reported to have told Hutchison that Kleiber might be trying to start his own emergency product supply company. He also told the investigator that he believed Kleiber had the knowledge necessary to reprogram the Icomm brand radios.

When Hutchison contacted the 19-year-old rural Readstown resident, Kleiber denied any knowledge or involvement relating to the missing radios. Kleiber told Hutchison he is a member of both the Readstown and North Crawford Rescue Squads. He also confirmed he has an aspiration of starting his own emergency products supply company.

Kleiber stated he and Zirk recently had a falling out over a matter and as a result, he had been contacted by a collection agency that he believed was orchestrated by Zirk, Hutchison reported.

The Crawford County Sheriff’s Department Lieutenant went on to report his considerable effort working with Zirk and others to find the serial numbers to the missing radios. Zirk repeatedly told Hutchison that he was unable to locate the serial numbers, but assured the officer he would keep trying, according to the investigation report.

Eventually, with the assistance of a Soldiers Grove Village Trustee, Hutchison was able to obtain serial numbers for the radios kept by the Office of Justice Assistance, a federal agency responsible for supplying grants to purchase the local fire department radios originally. By matching those serial numbers to the serial numbers on the radios still in the possession of the fire department, Hutchison was able to construct a list of serial numbers of the missing radios.

Zirk explained in an interview with the Independent-Scout that the fire department lost the list of serial numbers, when a laptop computer provided to him by the fire department crashed. He said he had entered the serial numbers on the computer and failed to keep any other list.

Later in June, Hutchison checked the numbers of new radios supplied to the department. During that check, it turned out one of the seven new radios was actually one of the department’s radios on the missing list. When Zirk was made aware of the situation, he changed his billing to the village from selling them seven radios to selling them six radios.

How did Zirk come to ‘sell’ the Soldiers Grove Fire Department one of the missing radios?

Zirk, the owner of D&Z Rescue Products, offered this explanation in his interview with the Independent-Scout. At some point, Soldiers Grove Fire Chief Dave Clason misplaced his radio and Zirk furnished a ‘loaner’ radio for the chief to use. Then, the chief found his own radio and the loaner was never returned, according to Zirk.

When the department tried to assemble all of the radios to determine how many were missing, another officer in the department identified one of the radios as the ‘loaner’ and handed it to Zirk. The owner of D&Z Rescue Products said he thought he had the loaner returned and did not have serial numbers to check on his own ‘loaner’ radio or those of the department.

Then, Zirk ordered six radios from a supplier and figured the loaner would make the seventh needed replacement radio. However, when Hutchison discovered the seventh radio was actually one of the lost or stolen radios, Zirk changed his bill to reflect the sale of six not seven radios.

How many portable Icomm radios does the Soldiers Grove Fire Department now own?

The fire department actually owns 21 radios even though OJA grants only paid for 20 originally. It turns out after determining seven were missing and taking steps to replace as many, another radio was found by Chief Clason between the seats of one of the fire trucks. In all, of the 20 original Icomm radios bought with two OJA grants, nine have now been replaced. In addition to the six replaced this year, the department replaced three lost at the scene of a fire in 2010.

How common is it for a department to lose portable radios?

While Baxter, the district attorney, seemed to think it was highly unlikely a small fire department would lose or misplace five highly expensive radios, Zirk, the owner of D&Z Rescue Products, took a different view.

Zirk said as a supplier of radios he saw cases where radios were misplaced and then had to be replaced. He cited instances  locally of both Readstown and LaFarge EMS or Fire Departments needing to replace two or three radios. However, he went on to acknowledge that missing six or seven radios was unusual.

Another issue discussed at the village board meetings and elsewhere has been the cost of replacing the radios and the amount of interest charged for late payment. Like most parts of the missing Soldiers Grove Fire Department portable radios, their cost is also complicated, a bit confusing and a subject of contention.

Ultimately, Zirk through his D&Z Rescue Products billed the village $1,999.99 per radio or $11,999.94 for six radios. Zirk was forced to alter his billing from seven radios to six when one of the seven replacement radios was found to be one already owned by the department through a serial number check.

Village trustee Jerry Moran claimed to have found the exact same radio as purchased by the department from D&Z from another provider for $940. In his report, Hutchison references the fact that the prices charged for the radios appeared to be about twice the price quoted by another supplier.

“The assertion of Zirk’s financial gain was supported when a price comparison for the recent Icom portable radios provided by Zirk’s company to the Soldiers Grove Fire Department, was provided by ComElec Service on July 23, 2013,” Hutchison wrote in his investigative report.

“The quote from Com Elec relating to those radios was less than half the price per unit, in comparison to the D&Z Rescue Emergency Products charge for the same unit,” according to Hutchison.

Despite the price discrepancy, the village board voted to pay the price, $11,999.94, billed by D&Z. Initially, the board also agreed to pay $8,399.96 billed by D&Z in late fees. However at a subsequent meeting, the board rescinded that motion and agreed to pay just $660 in late fees or 5.5 percent of the total purchase.

In his initial billing, Zirk had noted on the bill that there was a 10 percent charge for payment after 30 days and another 20 percent payment for every 30-day period past the initial 30 days. Although the radios were not delivered and made operable until some time in June, a date disputed by the board and the fire department, Zirk began counting the first 30 days from May 2, when he presented an invoice for billing purposes to the village for us in filing their insurance. This bill was for seven radios, although six would be the number delivered. And even by Zirk and the fire department’s version the radios were not present or operable on June 1. D&Z added $1,200 to the bill on June 1, 30 days after the initial billing of May 2. The bill was later adjusted to show just six radios, instead of seven sold, at a cost of $12,000 instead of $14,000. D&Z then added $2,400 (20 percent of the cost of the purchase) on July 1, another $2,400 on August 1 and another $2,400 on Sept. 1 for a total cost of $8,400 (actually $8,399.96).

When the board rescinded its action and reduced its late fee payment to just $600, Zirk immediately accepted the payment along with the payment for the radios, even though the late payment fee offered was just a little more than seven percent of what he had billed in late payments.

The cost of the radios and the machinations around it brought up a larger issue to board members, Hutchison and others familiar with the situation.

Is there a conflict of interest in having D&Z Rescue Emergency Products sell equipment to the Soldiers Fire Department, when D&Z’s owner also serves as a lieutenant on the department and its treasurer.

Hutchison said in an interview about his report that the issue of conflict of interest was an ethical question and not a criminal matter.

At one point during the last five years, the Soldiers Grove Village Board had told the fire department to stop purchasing equipment and materials from D&Z, but that pronouncement was ignored as the administration of fire chiefs changed.

For his part, Zirk sees no conflict of interest. He noted that while he does serve on the department, he has never voted on any sales involving his company.

Zirk, as well as other members of the department, believe buying from D&Z is a good deal because Zirk does installation and minor maintenance free of charge and is on hand, as a resident to the village, to help with the products he sells.

Public input and Myrtle Lake discussions lively at village board meeting
Soldiers Grove
Soldiers Grove

As is often the case, the public input portion of the agenda at the June 10 meeting of the Soldiers Grove Village Board was lively. Village resident Phil Carey once again appeared to bring up issues he is experiencing with flooding on Baker Creek, and ponding of water in his backyard.

“This is the fourth time I've appeared before this board, and unfortunately, it’s always in public input,” Carey said. “The very first time this came up in discussion was in July of 2024. The meeting minutes reflected it was tabled at that time for more information from the village attorney. My first question is, did you receive the e-mail I sent to all of you on the 24th of April? I thought that might have prompted this to get on the agenda for the May meeting. It didn't. I hoped that it would be on tonight's agenda. I didn't see the agenda until I got here - it wasn't on your website. It's not on the agenda again.”

Carey recounted that the village had told him that the topic of Baker Creek flooding, and what could be done to alleviate the problems on his property would be on the  board’s February agenda. He said that he’d been told the village was waiting on information from Delta-3 Engineers, and from the village’s attorney. Then, he was told it would be moved to the board’s March agenda.

“I was told tonight by Kaitlynn (the village clerk-Kaitlyn Ott) that Delta-3 hasn't created a plan, and now in June, a year after this flood, we still don't have anything from Delta-3, and we don't have a plan,” Carey pointed out. “Further, I was told that the dead fall would be removed from the creek and the willow thicket would be cut. There was an attempt to cut the willow thicket in September of last year, an eight-foot strip this way, an eight-foot strip that way. And he drove away. I came to you in October before I went back to North Carolina for the winter, and you assured me the deadfall would be removed, and the willow thicket would be cut.”

Carey said he’d provided board members with pictures from last year, and from this year, showing that the deadfall and willow thicket remain. He said he’d spent $1,200 this spring renting the equipment to remove the willow thicket himself, and experienced significant difficulty with willows wrapping around the blades on the machine.

“To my surprise, neither Jim Thoftne or Jerry Moran said they gave permission to the village for anything to be done on their properties,” Carey said. “They were shocked that I was taking the willow thicket out, and I was told by the village that permission had been given. Jerry thought Jim asked for it to be mowed, and Jim thought Jerry asked for it to be mowed.”

Carey also addressed the issue of who is responsible for maintenance of the flood control dike in the village. Carey had shared correspondence from Congressman Derrick Van Orden’s office indicating that the Corps of Engineers has no legal authority to advance any repairs, and that the State of Wisconsin passed legislation in the early 1990s that created a local management board to oversee the levee property. According to the e-mail from the Congressman’s office, the federal government then passed the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 which transferred the property rights to local/state authorities.

“The other thing I found out from Jerry Moran, who tells me he was your public works director for 23 years, is that there is indeed right of way for that entire levee, and that that the levee was modified, while he worked for the village. The village’s attorney said that it's the responsibility of the landowners, unless the village had previously done work on it. That's an ‘if.’ Now, Jerry has assured me work was done on that levee, so there's a lot going on here.”

At this point, there was some back-and-forth between various board members, the village clerk, and Phil Carey about whether the village attorney had written a letter as Carey had been told she would. The village’s attorney, Nikki Swayne, was present at the meeting and intervened to encourage the board to properly observe open meetings law.

“I'm uncomfortable with the discussion back-and-forth, and the reason for that is that it is arguably in violation of open meetings law,” Swayne said. “If we engage in a public audience session, in any conversation, it's a time to be heard. But the reason why it's important to not engage in discussion is that any members of the public who may find interest in the topic, aren't notified that that discussion may transpire.”

Swayne recommended that the board hear Carey out for his full, allotted three minutes, and then if any issues had arisen that the board would like to address in open session, to put the issue on the agenda of a future meeting.

Supervisor Vicki Campbell asked Swayne if the board could schedule a special meeting to address the issue prior to the next regular board meeting?

“If the board is inclined to hold a special meeting, you can do so with proper notice,” Swayne said.

Carey continued with his allotted three minutes of public input.

“The right of way on Third Street concerns me, because I'd like to go ahead with building a garage. When I applied for my building permit a year ago, I was told that the village would have to take care of the drainage issue. Yes, you have to take care of that drainage, but nothing's happening and nothing's changing. I don't have to take all that drainage water because you have no easement across my property.”

Village president Shayne Chapman said that the village intends to fix the culvert, which is not functioning properly.

Carey said he’d talked to Cole Fortney the prior night about the village abandoning Third Street, and was told that he is opposed to abandoning the right of way because he has gotten information that the village would like to maintain the roadway, and not only maintain it, but improve it.

“I was also told that if he doesn't want it, it can't be done,” Carey said. “That's not true - just last month you abandoned the roadway in the Kidd’s Addition by public hearing and majority vote. So if you can tell me that it's in the public's best interest to leave that roadway there the way it is, I challenge you that it's not, and I welcome this being on a board agenda for discussion.”

Myrtle Lake

Randy Swiggum appeared at the village board meeting to ask if the Swamp Project People could be allowed to continue their clean up efforts on Myrtle Lake.

“We're just here to see if you're gonna allow us to continue our work to clean up Myrtle Lake,” Swiggum told the board. “We've submitted a packet of information for your review. Continuing our  work would also include our fundraising efforts.”

Trustee Vicki Campbell questioned the financial information provided by the group, saying their numbers “don’t add up.”

“If you look in the package, you'll also find the investments that we've made in assets,  like our Neptune rake that we purchased to progress with the project,” Swiggum responded.

Campbell then asked who has control of the group’s money, and who does the bookkeeping and accounting?

“Justice Benson is our president, and he oversees pretty much any kind of spending that we would do, which has been nothing since you guys kind of put a halt to us,” Swiggum responded. “So, we're just trying to be transparent as per your request. If you want to see our bank statements, we can do that too.”

Swiggum said the group’s bank account is sitting there with the balance that the board was shown in the packet of information they received.

“I don't know what else that you need to understand. You know that this project is all about helping our village and economic growth and making a great place for families and events that could help our economy going forward, right?” Swiggum said.

“But, if I can interrupt, Randy, you guys have been doing this since 2020, and you said it's going to take another 10 years to get this project done,” Campbell said. “What about the next three or four floods that come through, and you're back to the same spot we’re in now.”

“What if I could tell you more in depth about the scope of the project? First of all, we want to get some aeration going in there to get the oxygen level up where it's supposed to be, and try and get some of the weed growth down,” Swiggum explained. “The project finish is out there a ways because this is something that costs a lot of money to do, and without fundraising and without permission from the village, obviously we can't continue.”

“And I guess that's my point. You've been working since 2020. This is 2025. What have you done in the last two years?” Campbell asked.

“Well, the last year, you haven't let us do anything, Swiggum said. “Before that, we bought a Neptune rake, which allows us to remove the invasive weeds out of the pond itself. And we did have a permit last year from the DNR to be able to do so, but as per your instructions, we were not allowed.”

Campbell asked if the group has a DNR permit to remove the weeds for 2025?

“The permit we had for last year when we got shut down has expired. I've been in communication with a representative of the DNR with lakes and rivers and streams, and I basically just need to go in and renew that permit to be able to again remove weeds,” Swiggum explained. “After that, we’ll pursue diffusion and aeration to bring up the oxygen level, which will take the level of weed growth way down.”

“I guess my concern Randy, is that they've been trying to do this since I was 20. And you know, it was thousands and thousands of dollars, and nothing came of it,” Campbell expressed. “That was because of the floods. Because every time it floods, you're gonna have bikes and lumber in there, and I think you're just wasting money.”

“I disagree,” Swiggum responded. “There's been a lot of advances in what we can do and how we can do it. A lot of the big problem before was taking the material that would be dredged off site somewhere. We would contain that stuff, and not remove it from the site. It will be used as for landscaping and mitigation for floods.”

 Swiggum explained that with the dewatering bags, all of the sediment dredged from the lake is contained. And, after it's all drained out, there's new landscape materials that will come in, black dirt, and so forth.

“Where are the dewatering bags going to go,” village president Shayne Chapman asked. “I don’t think I want to see those in our park.”

“I’m shocked, I'm shocked. Also, I think everybody watching right now is going to be shocked as well,” Phil Carey commented. “These people have passion and commitment and drive to do something better than what has previously been done and failed, and you don't support them.”

“Is there a DNR permit that we can get to just drain it and fill it in?” Chapman asked.

“You're not telling me anything that I haven't thought about many times,” Swiggum said. “The research on this has been extensive. I can’t tell you how many hours I and others have put in to making this feasible. And if you are not willing to look at it, and try to understand and say, yes, okay, that might work or no, there's no way how that may work. But if you're just going to shut us down before even understanding how this possibility can go forward, it just seems a little ludicrous.”

“Can I add something?” Arleena Peralta-Roe asked. “Just a thought and suggestion. I suggest that you guys preview the plan we’ve presented, come up with your questions, and then sit down with the group. We can figure out what your concerns are, and what your expectations would be. We could come in once a month or once a quarter to let you know where we are on this plan, if things have changed, what we’ve learned… if you hold the group accountable, I think that's a good relationship.”

Peralta-Roe said that the group’s fundraisers were about more than raising money, but also about raising awareness.

Campbell moved that the board sit down with the Swamp People Project, and they can take the board through the whole project, the science part of it and the money, part of it.

“And then we can sit down as a group, your group, the board, and go through everything and then make a decision if we still feel that it's something okay to do,” Campbell proposed.

The motion passed unanimously.

In other business

In other business, the board:

• discussed whether the fire department should put up perimeter fencing for the Driftless Area Art Festival

• heard that over the last three weeks, the fire department had rebuilt the crows nest at the horse arena

• learned that the village would have to move fire hydrants, and 10-15 curb boxes on Church Street as part of the Highway 131 project in the next two weeks, and that communication around the project had been challenging

• agreed to acquire meters, and to begin to charge to use the showers in the park

• agreed to donate $400 to the Gays Mills Fire Department for the Fourth of July fireworks.