By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
School district poses two funding questions for voters Tuesday
What they are asking for
Placeholder Image

Boscobel School District voters will answer two requests for funding – one for operations and another for building – at the ballot box on Tuesday, April 5.

The school district’s current tax levy mill rate is $6.62 per $1,000 of equalized property values.

The tax levy is determined by the state using a formula mandated by the legislature using enrollment and property values. That formula creates a cap as to how much a school district can levy without asking for approval from voters through referendum.

Operations

The first question relates to funding the district’s overall operations. The school district has a $941,911 deficit for the current 2015-2016 school year.  That deficit is being handled through budget cuts and drawing on the district’s general fund reserves. At the end of this year, the district will have a fund balance of $1.3 million.

Without additional funding approved through the referendum, the school district’s general fund balance, district deficit, and mill rate will be:

• 2016-2017 – a general fund balance of $163,418 after a funding deficit of -$1.17 million and a mill rate of $6.09 per $1,000 of equalized property values;

• 2017-2018 – a general fund balance of -$1.45 million after a funding deficit of -$1.6 million and a mill rate of $5.35 per $1,000;

• 2018-2019 – a general fund balance of -$3.27 million after a funding deficit of -$1.8 million and a mill rate of $4.87 per $1,000;

• 2019-2020 – a general fund balance of -$4.39 million after a funding deficit of -$2.12 million and a mill rate of $4.43 per $1,000; and

• 2020-2021 – a general fund balance of -$7.99 million after a funding deficit of -$2.6 million and a mill rate of $3.50 per $1,000.

Maintenance of a general fund balance is commonly accepted as necessary in order for schools to avoid short term borrowing to maintain cash flow for operation of the school district. According to the Wisconsin Department of Instruction, an appropriate fund balance is a critical factor in district financial planning and budgeting processes to avoid excessive short term borrowing and associated interest costs; to cover unforeseen expenditure needs; and to preserve or enhance the school district’s bond rating, thereby lowering debt costs when it does borrow by earning lower interest rates. As a general rule, some private sector auditing firms recommend a minimum level for fund balances between 20% and 30% of a school district’s general fund operating expenditures.

Also of note is the fact that with each decrease in the local levy, the schools see a decrease in state aid, which exacerbates deficit growth.

Building

The second question seeks funding to address both rising costs relating to the operation of multiple buildings and repair issues that need to be addressed at the current middle/high school.

The building referendum would fund the repairs at the middle and high school and improve sports facilities by adding a larger gymnasium, while creating a single campus by building an addition to the north side of the middle/high school structure to house the early education and elementary classes.

Operational referendum

impact

The Boscobel School District operational referendum seeks to exceed the tax levy by $1.8 million, implemented over the course of three years.

The first year would see the tax levy increased by $950,000, raising the mill rate from $6.62 per $1,000 of equalized property values to $9.37. The projected deficit would be reduced to $224,571 and the general fund would be lowered to $1.11 million.

The second year the tax levy would increase an additional $650,000, raising the mill rate to $10.83 per $1,000. The projected deficit would be reduced to $14,134 and the general fund would be lowered to $1.099 million.

In the third year, the levy would increase an additional $200,000 with the mill rate rising to $11.03 per $1,000. The projected deficit would be reduced to $4,588 and the general fund would be lowered to $1.094 million.

The school would see the deficit begin to increase after this three-year period with a projected deficit of $317,831 and mill rate of $10.51 per $1,000 in the 2019-2020 school year and a projected deficit of $831,183 and mill rate of $9.38 per $1,000 in 2020-2021.

The approval to exceed the levy by $1.8 million would remain in place until the school district either voted to rescind the increase or chose not to collect its full amount for two years in succession, in which case it would revert to the base levy amount estimated by the state formula. The board would have to go to referendum again in order to reinstitute or raise the levy further.

Building referendum

impact

The Boscobel School District is seeking $20 million for the building referendum.

If only the building referendum passes, the impact would raise the mill rate to $10.53 per $1,000 of equalized property values in 2016-2017; $8.43 per $1,000 in 2017-2018; $8.16 per $1,000 in 2018-2019; $7.58 per $1,000 in 2019-2020; and $6.65 per $1,000 in 2020-2021.

Combined referenda

mill rate impact

If both referenda are approved by voters, the mill rate impact will be:

• 2016-2017 – $13.82 per $1,000 of equalized property values;

• 2017-2018 – $13.91 per $1,000 of equalized property values;

• 2018-2019 – $14.32 per $1,000 of equalized property values;

• 2019-2020 – $13.66 per $1,000 of equalized property values; and

• 2020-2021 – $12.53 per $1,000 of equalized property values.

Village must meet phosphorous levels or find alternative
Gays Mills
gays mills village board

The Village of Gays Mills Board received a report on the status of the Wastewater Treatment Project from Evan Chambers, a project engineer at Town and Country Engineering.

The proposed new Wastewater Treatment Plant to be built in the village is planned, but cannot presently be built because of cost. Town & Country is working with the village to find  funding in grants and loans to build the plant.

While some new treatment plants built in the state can meet the latest very low level of phosphorous discharge required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, others cannot. The treatment plant as proposed for Gays Mills will be a big step forward, but it will not include the filtration equipment to get to the required level.

With or without the completion of the treatment plant, Chambers pointed out the village will need to get credits for projects elsewhere in the area. These can be used as water trading credits to fulfill reducing phosphorous elsewhere to offset the amount the village cannot achieve at the current or future plant.

The village is seeking to renew its five-year variance with the DNR by using water trading credits from other projects it funds upstream from the plant.

Chambers Told the board they needed to sign up some new projects that might include rip-rapping streambanks to prevent soil erosion carrying phosphorous into the stream. Calculation of soil erosion reductions would show how much phosphorous is being kept out of the river and ultimately the village would get credit for reducing phosphorus with project to offset what is exceeding the current limit.

Chambers told the board he had soil sample lined up with potential partner and would know more soon.

“The village will need partnerships no matter what,” Chambers said.

Village trustees Art Winsor and Kevin Murray expressed concern that the partnerships would be a workable solution.

Winsor questioned, if figures obtained for the credits needed to comply with the lower phosphorus level requirements, were accurate. The trustee asked if was possible to overshoot with some sort of treatment and get more credits than needed.

Chambers explained, in the event that happened, the village could trade the extra phosphorus to another municipality that needed it.

Murray noted that the plant is no closer to being built than it was before the plant was created. He pointed out the cost of building the plant has skyrocketed year after.

In answer to a question, Chambers said the current cost to build the new sewer plant as designed is estimated to be $13 million and the village could not do it without getting 70% of cost financed by grants.

“You can’t get there without grant,” Chamber the engineer also noted that grant funding has dried up.

The variance the water trading credits obtain for the village keeps it going. Chambers said the village can’t afford to not get a variance and be found out of compliance and face large fines.

“We’re getting good results with what we’re doing,” Chamber told the board.

After some discussion trustee Larry McCarn made a motion to approve the Town & Country’s Scope of Service for the Final Phosphorous Report and Pollutant Minimization Plan. Winsor seconded the motion and the board passed the motion.

In other business, the Gays Mills Village Board:

 • approved Mara O’Brien as new lifeguard at the pool and learned the pool lost the services of two other lifeguards

• learned that Ray and Danielle Strong, the pool directors, will be available to serve as life guards

• heard that the plan is to open the pool on Saturday, June 7

• learned that the building inspector has been contacted to report on the nuisance properties at 200 Main Street and 208 Main Street

• approved a temporary Alcohol License for wine and beer for the Friends of Gays Mills for May 16 at the Community Commerce Center for the Alice in Dairyland event

• clarified the sewer hookup fee waive extension would be allowed for all hookups–not just for homeowners, who had filed an application with the village