By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Marklein meets with Boscobel constituents
Howard Marklein
Howard Marklein

A half-dozen citizens braved subzero temps to air their concerns with Boscobel’s state senator, Howard Marklein, on January 15.

The event was billed as a listening session, designed to give members of the public a chance to raise issues important to them, but with the light turnout, the session turned into a free-flowing conversation among participants, including Senator Marklein.

School funding

The group included three representatives of Boscobel’s school district—Administrator Lisa Wallin-Kapinus, Director of Business Services Jarrett Roethke, and Jimmie Kaska, a parent and assistant football coach who sits on the district school board.

All three addressed the financial problems faced by rural districts like Boscobel. The last legislative session boosted state aid to schools—which comes through a variety of targeted funds, including perpupil operating funds, monies to reimburse special education costs, and special funding for districts that serve a broad geographic area. In spite of these state-level increases, many schools, including Boscobel, lost funding under the new model, according to attendees, because the student population is declining—a phenomenon that hits especially hard in rural, low-income regions like southwestern Wisconsin.

“I don’t know how we’re going to meet the Consumer Price Index cost of things,” Wallin-Kapinus told Marklein. “We can’t cut our way out of this. I can’t just keep cutting things out of the school.”

Faced with these fiscal realities, Kaska said, a growing number of districts in Boscobel’s position are relying on local property taxes. In the last election, Boscobel voters narrowly passed a referendum to update and expand the district’s high/middle school facility and close the old Rock Building.

Other districts, including a number in the southwest region, are asking taxpayers for “operational referendums” that simply help pay the bills, according to Kaska.

“I don’t know that it’s sustainable to increase property taxes,” Kaska said. “At some point, with the rising cost of everything, people are going to probably say ‘no.’ I don’t see that as a sustainable way of funding schools.”

Enrollment woes

Marklein responded that the problem was not so much the level of funding from the state, as the way that aid is apportioned. The primary source of state funding is a “per-pupil” allotment of about $12,000 per student.

“What’s the one variable that affects the size of your budget? Enrollment. So it ain’t state funding. It’s enrollment,” the senator said. Of the 34 districts in Marklein’s senate district, he added, most are facing similar declines as Boscobel.

“The problem we have, pick any rural school district, is the decline in the enrollment is more precipitous than the increase in any funding we can do,” he said. “The size of the pie is based on enrollment.”

Yet many costs remain roughly the same from one district to the next. A dozen students less might not impact the basic operations of a school—but when those dozen take $150,000 from the budget, it has an impact on non-fixed costs.

Another attendee, Joe Mc-Daniel, wondered if school closures weren’t the answer, pointing out that districts like Kickapoo and Seneca have even smaller student populations than Boscobel’s.

“I’m not going to go there,” Marklein answered. “That’s a local decision. But we can do more collaborative work between districts. I don’t see how some of the smaller districts are going to survive on their own.”

Mental health needs

Another primary issue that participants brought to the session was the need for better mental health resources in rural areas like Boscobel.

It’s an issue that hits close to home for Jimmie Kaska. When one of his children was struggling in school, his family had a hard time finding services to help.

“The health system we have here in town didn’t have anybody,” Kaska told the Senator. “We couldn’t take him to La-Crosse because they’re booked out over a year. The hospital we did find that had something within 8 to 12 months, we were told we’d have to change our primary care to this hospital system and bring our son to Minnesota. So mental health services in our area are severely lacking. And this wasn’t for a serious behavioral issue. It’s just, we wanted to make sure our son is okay.”

Marklein shared the concerns of his constituents, and wondered if the pandemic and lockdown was a contributing factor.

“We are social people,” he said. “I’m not a doctor, but I believe COVID accelerated the symptoms for a bunch of mental health issues.”

Wallin-Kapinus said she sees the effects of this isolation firsthand in younger kids entering school for the first time.

“We’re seeing it in 4K classrooms,” she said. “It’s crazy what they don’t know. They were born during COVID, and were at home, and not doing social things, learning social cues.”

Worker shortages

While Marklein pointed to the legislature’s increased funding for mental health services through Wisconsin’s Department of Public Health, he cautioned that paying for healthcare was only one aspect of the problem.

“Who’s the provider? Who are the specialists that are going to provide the mental health care?” Marklein asked. “We could put more money into it, but are we going to get providers here in southwest Wisconsin?”

The shortage of workers, generally, was another common refrain of the listening session, with school officials pointing out the difficulty of attracting and retaining talent as yet another financial pressure on school budgets.

In the realm of mental health services, Marklein pointed to experiments in telehealth, including one pilot program, borrowed from South Dakota, that connects first responders to mental health professionals in real time.

Katy Prange, Marklein’s Chief of Staff, explained that it’s a tool for law enforcement—who are often the first ones to help in a mental health crisis.

“If they go to a call, and they know it is more a mental health issue than anything else, they actually can hand the iPad to the person and a live person will be talking to them face to face. They can deescalate, or figure out what’s going on, or help the police know what to do next,” she said.

Climate change

While schools and mental health dominated the conversation, McDaniel raised the issue of climate change as another concern and encouraged the development of electric vehicles in the public sector.

Wallin-Kapinus reported that the school had applied for a grant to purchase an electric bus, but had not received it.

Other sessions

Other listening sessions with Senator Marklein are available for those who missed this one and want their voices heard. The following sessions are upcoming:

• Monday, January 29, 2024, 1-2 p.m., Blanchardville Village Hall

• Friday, February 2, 2024, 10-11 a.m., New Lisbon Library Community Room

• Monday, February 12, 2024, 1:30-2:30 p.m., Platteville Public Library

Hearings set for Badger Hollow Wind Farm permit
Madison June 17, Linden June 24
Badger Hollow map
The proposed Badger Hollow Wind Farm would be near Livingston.

The developers of the proposed Badger Hollow Wind Farm near Livingston will argue their case for approval from the state Public Service Commission later this year.

The hearings on Badger Hollow’s Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity application will be held in Madison June 17 and in Linden June 24.

The proposed 118-megawatt wind farm to be built by Invenergy of Chicago would feature 19 wind turbines 574 to 656 feet tall in the Grant County towns of Clifton and Wingville and the Iowa County towns of Eden, Linden and Mifflin, connected by a 345,000-volt tie line, with an additional collector station.

The turbines would be located in a jagged line from east of Cobb to south of Cobb to the American Transmission Co. Hill Valley substation in Montfort, then south past Livingston to northeast of Rewey. The Hill Valley substation is part of the Cardinal–Hickory Creek power transmission line project.

The PSC sent a letter April 11 saying that PSC and state Department of Natural Resources found in a joint environmental review that “no significant impacts on the human or natural environment are likely to occur because of the construction or operation of this project.”

The PSC/DNR determination means the agencies will not do an Environmental Impact Statement, a more detailed environmental review.

The PSC letter said the turbines would produce no more than 44 decibels f sound, below the PSC noise standards of 50 decibels during the day and 45 decibels at night.

The PSC letter said blade flicker, which “some individuals may feel extremely affected while others experience little distraction,” would be expected for 29 hours 47 minutes per year. The letter says the developer is “willing to evaluate options such as vegetative buffers, blinds, and/or turbine curtailment to reduce shadow flicker” if mitigation is needed, including for “non-participating residences or occupied community buildings that receive more than 20 hours of shadow flicker per year.”

The letter said the project is “not expected to have a significant impact on rare species during the construction or operational phase,” including on bats and birds.

The PSC letter said the project would “affect the aesthetics of the area for as long as it is in operation which may be looked at favorably or unfavorably depending on the viewer.”

The deadline for public comment on the environmental review was May 2. One person who commented was Gina Metelica of Platteville, who said the Driftless Region and its sensitive karst geology should not “become a Sacrifice Zone.”

Metelica said in testimony to the PSC that wind farm projects were put on hold in two other areas with karst geology — the Timberwolf Wind Project in Fillmore County, Minn., which was supposed to become operational in 2023, and the Republic Wind Farm in Ohio, which was canceled after 27 of 47 wind turbines were to be located on “areas exhibiting karst features.”

Metelica said the vibrations from wind turbines in karst areas “can accelerate the collapse of sinkholes and impact ground water flow. Construction activities such as driving piles for turbine foundations can generate higher vibration levels which can impact groundwater flow to surrounding wells or the water quality,” including in areas with abandoned lead and zinc mines.

The PSC’s Madison hearing on Badger Hollow will be held in the Hill Farm State Office Building, 4822 Madison Yards Way, Tuesday, June 17 at 10 a.m.

The PSC then will hold a public hearing at the Village of Linden Community Building, 460 Main St., Tuesday, June 24 at 2 and 6 p.m.

Both meetings will be able to be viewed on Zoom at https://us02web.zoom.us/my/pschearings. The meeting will also be shown at www.youtube.com/@PSCWI-Hearings. Those who can’t access the internet will be able to access the meeting audio by calling 312-626-6799 and entering meeting ID 809-513-2930.

The PSC meeting notice says that due to “technical limitations at the Linden hearing location” Zoom may not be able to be used. A notice on Zoom in Linden will be posted at https://apps.psc.wi.gov/apps/Calendar/External/HearingDetails/55.

Comments may also be written by June 26 at https://apps.psc.wi.gov/pages/publicCommentCase.htm?util=9827&case=CF&num=100. or mailed to Docket 9827-CE-100 Comments, Public Service Commission, P.O. Box 7854, Madison, WI 53707-7854.

The proposed Badger Hollow Wind Farm is east of Red Barn, built by Allete Clean Energy of Duluth, Minn., which has 28 turbines producing 92 megawatts. The wind farm is 90 percent owned by Wisconsin Public Service Corp. of Green Bay and 10 percent owned by Madison Gas & Electric.

Red Barn, which began operation in 2023, has been the source of complaints including health effects. The blade of a Red Barn turbine separated from its hub on Annaton Road west of Livingston last September. Two other Red Barn turbines have flaws in blades.

The Badger Hollow project is one of four proposed for this area.

The largest proposed area wind farm is Pattern Energy’s Uplands Wind project, with a map submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration in April that showed 181 possible locations for wind turbines in the 600-megawatt $1 billion project. According to the FAA map three wind turbine locations are immediately west of the Platte Mound and two are south of the Mound between Lafayette County B and U.S. 151. Other locations are near Belmont Mound State Park.

Allete proposed building the Whitetail Wind project in the Town of Clifton, which would install 21 2- to 4.2-megawatt wind turbines to generate 70 megawatts of power east of Red Barn. However, Allete sold the project to Invenergy, the builder of the Badger Hollow Solar Farm east of Montfort, which proposing building the Badger Hollow Wind Farm near the solar project.

Allete’s PSC application lists the towers as 410 to 650 feet tall from ground to the tip of the top blade, with rotor diameter of up to 492 feet. The application said Whitetail Wind is negotiating with a wind turbine supplier “and will confirm the final number and model(s) of turbines” for the project when negotiations conclude.

Allete’s Whitetail Wind application said it has “formal leases/easements” with landowners for more than 5,000 acres in the 12,793-acre project site.

Seven turbines are slated to be located on Wisconsin 80, five on Rock Church Road, four on Grant County E, two on Old 80 Road, one on New California Road, one on Hickory Grove, and one off Hopewell Road, according to the application. Two meteorological towers also would be built on four locations — two off County E, one north of Crow Branch Lane and one west of 80 just south of the north Livingston village limits.

Whitetail Wind does not require a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the PSC because the project is smaller than 100 megawatts, according to the application.

Liberty Utilities, a subsidiary of a Canadian utility, is proposing a 30- to 40-turbine project, with turbines up to 656 feet tall, to generate 200 megawatts of electricity in western Grant County. The proposed project area is south of U.S. 18 west of Wisconsin 133 and along Wisconsin 35/133 and generally west of Grant County J.