By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Letters to The Platteville Journal for July 23
Placeholder Image

Inaccurate reports

On July 10, a tragic accident occurred on a farm in Grant County Wisconsin east of Lancaster. A nine-year-old boy lost his life when he unexpectedly entered a corn grain bin and was engulfed.

A second tragedy then occurred. After multiple local rescue agency volunteers poured their energy into the recovery of the boy, the story published in print and on the air was inaccurate. It stated that the auger system was broken and that the family was repairing it when the accident occurred. This may make a reasonable person think that it was faulty equipment or that the owner was negligent in keeping it in good working order. Neither is true.

The equipment was in good working order. The farmer/father was not repairing equipment nor had he sent anyone into the bin to work on anything. He alone was operating the unload system outside the bin in a safe manner. When he noted that his son was not close by he shut down the system, called and looked for the boy; just as we all would; then called for emergency assistance.

Although the father had instructed his children that they were NOT allowed in a bin, this 9 year old maybe forgot or chose to ignore the rule. Children sometimes do that. He had to climb all the way to the top and then down the inside.

Unfortunately the heartache and grief that the family and community endure is compounded by the inaccuracy of the story. Those outside our area, assuming the story is accurate, will continue to believe that rural farm children are mistreated and put into high risk work situations. This is simply not true in this case! It is unfortunate that no one reporting the story asked anyone from the family nor anyone there when the accident occurred what actually happened.

Harold Reddy
Reddy Ag Service, Stitzer

Editor’s note: See the story on page 3A. Last week’s story was based on information from the Grant County Sheriff’s Office.

The Bible and marriage

Recently, same-sex marriage has been a topic in the news. I feel I must give the Bible’s perspective on what marriage is. I see many articles are being printed that present a support for it, so I feel bound to give another perspective.

I support the 2006 State of Wisconsin Marriage Law, and totally am in agreement with it. We as a state should not tamper with it.

Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen said June 13 after U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb stayed her ruling that “The state and all of its agencies and subdivisions must follow and enforce Wisconsin’s marriage law. County clerks do not have authority under Wisconsin law to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Judge Crabb’s stay makes this abundantly clear.”

I am in total support of Van Hollen’s leadership in support of our current Marriage Law, and it is my hope that it will always remain in effect. In fact, our marriage law is in agreement with what Jesus, the Christ taught on the matter in Matthew 19:4–6: ‘Haven’t you read the Scriptures?’ Jesus replied. ‘They record that from the beginning “God made them male and female.”’ And he said, ‘This explains why a man leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united into one. Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together.”

I felt the need to share with the public what I am sure many others in Wisconsin believe and support, that marriage is and will only be between one man and one women, just like God Himself taught.

Rev. Brian E. Chapman
Platteville

The Platteville Journal will print most letters to the editor, regardless of the opinion presented. The Journal reserves the right to edit material that is libelous or otherwise offensive to community standards and to shorten letters the Journal feels are excessively long. All letters must be signed and the signature must appear on the printed letter, along with a contact number or email for verification. Some submitted letters may not be published due to space constraints. “Thank you” letters will not be printed. All letters and columns represent the views of the writers and not necessarily the views of The Platteville Journal.

County should extend CAFO Moratorium
More time needed for discussion
Cty Bd CAFO moratorium
ALMOST 80 citizens at-tended the Crawford County Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, Dec. 17. The citizens were there to offer input to the board about whether the county should enact a one-year moratorium on CAFOs.

                 Steuben

Editor,

As a concerned citizen and landowner in Crawford County, I am grateful that the Crawford County Board of Supervisors listened to the concerns of their constituents and passed the Moratorium on the Expansion and Creation of New Livestock Facility Siting Operations, a CAFO Moratorium, in December 2019. 

They recognized then, the importance of studying an issue that affects the health, safety, and welfare of all citizens and on Tuesday, they will once again have the opportunity to show support by voting to extend the CAFO Moratorium for one more year.  

As we all know, 2020 was an unprecedented year and due to COVID restrictions, the appointed CAFO study committee did not have the time to do their due diligence researching and learning about CAFO impacts, in depth water studies could not be completed as originally planned, and Board members have not had the necessary time to read, learn about and discuss County options concerning the siting and expansion of CAFOs in Crawford County. 

By extending the CAFO Moratorium, the CAFO Study Committee would have the time needed to thoroughly investigate the impacts that increased numbers of CAFOs within Crawford County may have on the County’s economy, environment, and citizens and it would give Board members adequate time to consider the information and how to best plan for the future of CAFOs in Crawford County.  

In the Crawford County Code of Ordinances, the responsibility of public office is stated as such: “Public officials and employees are agents of the public and hold office for the benefit of the public. They are bound to uphold…and carry out impartially the laws of the …County to observe in their official acts the highest standard of morality and to discharge faithfully the duties of their office regardless of personal considerations, recognizing that the public interest must be their prime concern.”

In the past months I have read many letters and articles from concerned citizens, township governing bodies, and local organizations like the Sterling-Crawford and the Vernon-Crawford chapter of the Wisconsin Farmers Union and the Coulee Region Chapter of Trout Unlimited, to name a few, that all feel that it would be in the best interest of Crawford County citizens to extend the moratorium.

I, as a concerned citizen, am appealing to all County Board Supervisors to “recognize that the public interests”, the public’s concerns about the health, economic, and environmental impacts that increased numbers of CAFOs in Crawford County could have, “must be their prime concern,” and urge them to vote to extend the moratorium.

Gina L. Holtz