By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Letters to The Platteville Journal for June 3
Placeholder Image

More EMS questions

Despite the fact that the decision was asked to be delayed for at least a month until more people had a chance to hear of the proposed change, the vote on transferring Platteville EMS control to Southwest Health was brought up at the May 26 Common Council meeting.  As one concerned citizen stated, if it’s a good idea tonight, it will still be a good idea in three weeks. That fact was overlooked as the council voted 5–2 to pass the motion. 

This quick action was only two weeks after the transfer agreement was introduced to the public at the May 12 council meeting. This was also before the towns had a chance to poll their members and vote as to whether they would like to be a part of the agreement.  The transfer can not officially be completed until the Town of Platteville also agrees to the terms.  

At the May 26 meeting, I was criticized for saying that the possible transfer had not been known to the public long enough. Alds. Barb Daus and Eileen Nickels brought up that the transfer idea was discussed at the Aug. 26 council meeting, and had I and the rest of the citizens of Platteville attended that meeting we would all be “in the know” about the proposed transfer.  

In checking the printed information presented at the Aug. 26 meeting by Brian Allen, City of Platteville EMS administrator, I discovered it was a list of pros and cons for the transfer. There was no information as to costs, etc. One “pro” that I found interesting was that if it was switched to the hospital from city control, there would be “no building/facility costs” for the city. Yet it appears that under the new contract the $130,000 to $150,000 to be paid to the hospital yearly by the city and townships will be used to build a new ambulance garage near the hospital.  

Until the Southwest Health paramedic-based service is up and running (this may take two years), we are told the only changes we will notice is the volunteer EMS people will wear a shirt that says Southwest Health EMT, the two ambulances will be repainted with the new name, the hospital will have the use of $450,000 to $500,000 city-owned ambulances and equipment for $1, and they will pay the EMS staff and collect all the fees for ambulance calls at the current rate of $650 to $850 per call plus $1,000 to $1,200 for any transfers.  The ambulances will also be housed in the city ambulance garage until the new building is completed at the hospital, estimated to be the end of 2016.

The speed with which this very important agenda item was pushed through left me wondering if there was some aspect of the agreement that would not survive a month of scrutiny if it had been delayed. The fact that at the end of the 20 years or even earlier if the contract is broken and the EMS service again becomes the city’s responsibility, the city will have paid for an ambulance garage that they do not own. Another factor of concern is that the city and townships will have no control or final say over the EMS program at the hospital.  The editor of The Platteville Journal stated it clearly when he said in the Sept. 3 Etc. column that “There is also something to be said about having the taxpayers in charge of EMS when the taxpayers will be paying for it one way or another.”

A final concern is that our new city manager will arrive July 1. Since this will be a large budget item for her to plan for wouldn’t it be advantageous to have her insight before it was signed?

Jessie Kilian
Platteville

 

Appreciation for Wolf

I would like to publicly express my appreciation to Larry Wolf for his respectful service to Grant County and its Board of Supervisors for the past 10 years. Larry was very instrumental in assisting the development of the county’s Information Technology Department together with other progressive projects.

In my opinion, I wish some of the other County Board members would have shown him more consideration when he served as County Board chairperson.

Vern Lewison
Grant County Board Supervisor, District 7
Fennimore

 

Real sportsmanship

I was one of the officials that officiated the Platteville vs. Prairie du Chien soccer match Thursday in Prairie du Chien. I am not very eloquent with words, but I really wanted to acknowledge probably the best piece of sportsmanship I have ever personally witnessed in my time as a player, coach or official. As you may or may not know, Prairie du Chien lost a student over the weekend who was close with many of the girls on the Prairie soccer team. The game was moved later to allow for the players to attend the funeral. 

During the pre-game handshake, each of the Platteville players carried a full-stem flower and gave it to one of their opponents, including the coach, and expressed condolences and kind words. It was a such a small but absolutely incredible gesture from your team to the Prairie players. Coach Hardyman and the Platteville players really represented your school district in a touching and caring way that I will certainly remember for years to come, as I’m sure the Prairie players will as well.

Eric Dieckman
Spring Green

 

The Platteville Journal will print most letters to the editor, regardless of the opinion presented. The Journal reserves the right to edit material that is libelous or otherwise offensive to community standards and to shorten letters The Journal determines are excessively long. All letters must be signed and the signature must appear on the printed letter, along with a contact number or email for verification. Some submitted letters may not be published due to space constraints. “Thank you” letters will not be printed. All letters and columns represent the views of the writers and not necessarily the views of The Platteville Journal.

County should extend CAFO Moratorium
More time needed for discussion
Cty Bd CAFO moratorium
ALMOST 80 citizens at-tended the Crawford County Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, Dec. 17. The citizens were there to offer input to the board about whether the county should enact a one-year moratorium on CAFOs.

                 Steuben

Editor,

As a concerned citizen and landowner in Crawford County, I am grateful that the Crawford County Board of Supervisors listened to the concerns of their constituents and passed the Moratorium on the Expansion and Creation of New Livestock Facility Siting Operations, a CAFO Moratorium, in December 2019. 

They recognized then, the importance of studying an issue that affects the health, safety, and welfare of all citizens and on Tuesday, they will once again have the opportunity to show support by voting to extend the CAFO Moratorium for one more year.  

As we all know, 2020 was an unprecedented year and due to COVID restrictions, the appointed CAFO study committee did not have the time to do their due diligence researching and learning about CAFO impacts, in depth water studies could not be completed as originally planned, and Board members have not had the necessary time to read, learn about and discuss County options concerning the siting and expansion of CAFOs in Crawford County. 

By extending the CAFO Moratorium, the CAFO Study Committee would have the time needed to thoroughly investigate the impacts that increased numbers of CAFOs within Crawford County may have on the County’s economy, environment, and citizens and it would give Board members adequate time to consider the information and how to best plan for the future of CAFOs in Crawford County.  

In the Crawford County Code of Ordinances, the responsibility of public office is stated as such: “Public officials and employees are agents of the public and hold office for the benefit of the public. They are bound to uphold…and carry out impartially the laws of the …County to observe in their official acts the highest standard of morality and to discharge faithfully the duties of their office regardless of personal considerations, recognizing that the public interest must be their prime concern.”

In the past months I have read many letters and articles from concerned citizens, township governing bodies, and local organizations like the Sterling-Crawford and the Vernon-Crawford chapter of the Wisconsin Farmers Union and the Coulee Region Chapter of Trout Unlimited, to name a few, that all feel that it would be in the best interest of Crawford County citizens to extend the moratorium.

I, as a concerned citizen, am appealing to all County Board Supervisors to “recognize that the public interests”, the public’s concerns about the health, economic, and environmental impacts that increased numbers of CAFOs in Crawford County could have, “must be their prime concern,” and urge them to vote to extend the moratorium.

Gina L. Holtz