By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
School funding trumps school accountability
Placeholder Image

In 2005, I was offered and accepted the job of Dean of Students at the Hillsboro Elementary School. At that time, my wife Linda and I were parents of a 5 year old and an 8 month old. With this in mind, there was a lot to consider as we contemplated this career move as it would also be a family move if things went well. Throughout that first school year (2005-06), I commuted about an hour to work each day. This was a year of learning. I learned on the job about the Hillsboro School District but I also learned more and more about the Hillsboro community. Some of the things I learned were more obvious to a newcomer than others. I recall in my interview (and I’ve told this story a number of times) that after being asked questions by the Board of Education, it was my turn to ask questions of them. The only question that really mattered was “Why should I consider moving my family to Hillsboro?” What followed were amazing stories of how the board members and then-Superintendent Ron Benish gave emotional responses of how much this school system had meant to and given them in their lifetime. Their pride in this school district and community “sealed the deal” so to speak, making it an easy decision for my wife and I to relocate to the community and build a home and subsequently begin to build a life with our two children.

Over the past 10 years, I have developed great pride in being from Hillsboro and a part of a school system that has great students, staff and parents. Unfortunately, there are several challenges facing Hillsboro and ALL other rural schools in the state of Wisconsin. Issues like declining enrollment and increasing poverty to name a few. State imposed revenue limits that are not increasing while the state share of providing funding to public education is decreasing. This decrease puts a greater tax burden on property owners in our rural communities and often  pits the community against the school as communities are more frequently forced to go to referendum in order to provide a quality education for students. This is unfortunate and it can certainly divide communities.

On Friday, Jan. 16, I attended a legislative breakfast at Mauston High School. Members of the state Assembly and Senate provided some input on issues like school accountability and educational policies coming out of Madison. There was a time for the audience (school administrators and board members) to ask questions of the panel of representatives. For the first time, I was the first to raise my hand...I had some things to get off my chest. While I was appreciative of the panel’s presence I expressed my disappointment that when school funding (and in this I include revenue limits) is easily the number 1 issue affecting schools around the state, the leadership instead chose to first focus on school accountability. I stated that I felt I could speak for all schools in attendance that we are not afraid of any measure of accountability...bring it on. I can see this because I know that everyday, schools like Hillsboro are doing the very best they can for students. But, please do something about the funding issue. I expressed to them that it might be very helpful if those who are forcing school districts to referendums just to operate would stand up and take accountability for their role in this rather than forcing communities into sometimes contentious referendum discussions and pitting neighbor against neighbor for an issue that was not created locally but at the state level. I ended by commenting that I wished there was some way that some person or group could regain influence in Madison to have the voice of our rural communities heard.

The referendum process is a difficult one. It puts fear in our students that the classes and opportunities they hope to have will disappear. It puts fear in dedicated employees and their families that they will have to relocate. It puts fear in the school board and administration that the district they serve will be decimated by cuts.

On Feb. 17, the voters of the School District of Hillsboro will have a decision to make.  At the end of that I hope the pride that brought families like mine to the community is as strong as it was in August 2005.

County should extend CAFO Moratorium
More time needed for discussion
Cty Bd CAFO moratorium
ALMOST 80 citizens at-tended the Crawford County Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday, Dec. 17. The citizens were there to offer input to the board about whether the county should enact a one-year moratorium on CAFOs.

                 Steuben

Editor,

As a concerned citizen and landowner in Crawford County, I am grateful that the Crawford County Board of Supervisors listened to the concerns of their constituents and passed the Moratorium on the Expansion and Creation of New Livestock Facility Siting Operations, a CAFO Moratorium, in December 2019. 

They recognized then, the importance of studying an issue that affects the health, safety, and welfare of all citizens and on Tuesday, they will once again have the opportunity to show support by voting to extend the CAFO Moratorium for one more year.  

As we all know, 2020 was an unprecedented year and due to COVID restrictions, the appointed CAFO study committee did not have the time to do their due diligence researching and learning about CAFO impacts, in depth water studies could not be completed as originally planned, and Board members have not had the necessary time to read, learn about and discuss County options concerning the siting and expansion of CAFOs in Crawford County. 

By extending the CAFO Moratorium, the CAFO Study Committee would have the time needed to thoroughly investigate the impacts that increased numbers of CAFOs within Crawford County may have on the County’s economy, environment, and citizens and it would give Board members adequate time to consider the information and how to best plan for the future of CAFOs in Crawford County.  

In the Crawford County Code of Ordinances, the responsibility of public office is stated as such: “Public officials and employees are agents of the public and hold office for the benefit of the public. They are bound to uphold…and carry out impartially the laws of the …County to observe in their official acts the highest standard of morality and to discharge faithfully the duties of their office regardless of personal considerations, recognizing that the public interest must be their prime concern.”

In the past months I have read many letters and articles from concerned citizens, township governing bodies, and local organizations like the Sterling-Crawford and the Vernon-Crawford chapter of the Wisconsin Farmers Union and the Coulee Region Chapter of Trout Unlimited, to name a few, that all feel that it would be in the best interest of Crawford County citizens to extend the moratorium.

I, as a concerned citizen, am appealing to all County Board Supervisors to “recognize that the public interests”, the public’s concerns about the health, economic, and environmental impacts that increased numbers of CAFOs in Crawford County could have, “must be their prime concern,” and urge them to vote to extend the moratorium.

Gina L. Holtz