By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
District approves referendum 6-2
Placeholder Image

    DARLINGTON - At the Darlington School Board meeting Monday, Jan. 4 the board approved three resolutions
    •Unanimously approved  the application of a grant for Fabrication Laboratory (FAB LAB) sponsored by the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation. The grant would fund 75% of equipment used in the current FAB LAB for maintenance, and ongoing growth of the FAB LAB.
    •The second resolution was to “Authorize the Darlington School District budget to exceed the revenue limit by $1,000,000 for the 2016-2017 school year, and by an additional $1,2000,000 (for a total of $2,200,000) for the 2017-2018 school year and thereafter for recurring purposes consisting of maintained and enhanced educational programming.”
    Bob Hermanson started the discussion by stating he supports exceeding the revenue limits, but I do not support the recurring part, so I will be voting no on this, I just don’t think it’s the way to go at this time.” Then Joe Riechers stated he shared the same sentiment and said, “nobody ever talks to me about anything, and I’ve heard from people that are not in favor of the recurring.” Hermanson continued, “I’ve stated all along that I didn’t think the recurring was the right way to go, going forward.”
    Nicholas Zuberbuhler  said, “the last nine years it has been recurring, but we called it non-recurring, that’s basically what we’ve done.” Hermanson responded, “the people still like the authority to say no.”
    Matt Wilson said, “the reason I support the resolution, is that I can’t convince myself that there will be a time, when we don’t need this money. We’re going to continue to get less money from the state, and things are going to get more expensive. I think it puts the district in the future in a very risky position, less state aid and things getting more expensive. I think now is the time to do the recurring.
    Zuberbuhler said, “if we don’t do the recurring, it handcuffs us in the sense that, we try to avoid the situation we’re in right now when we’re told by principals that we need two more teachers and we’re playing the teeter totter game, do we have the money or are we not going to have the money. We have staff that will be in limbo, and we don’t know if we will have the money.
    Aaron Wolfe says “I see this as a way districts have to cope with a revenue limit that no longer makes sense.”
    On a roll call vote Hermanson and Riechers voted no, Crist was absent, and the remaining board voted yes, as it passes 6-2.
    •The third resolution is related to the second resolution and takes care of the responsibilities of having a referendum. It also passes 6-2.
    In other business the board:
    •Accepted donations from Lafayette County Advocacy Group - $200 for DEMS for school supplies.
    •Accepted donation from Judith Thomas - $100 for the Joe Thomas Scholarship.
    •Donated old football jerseys from 80’s and 90’s to the Touchdown Club.
    •Approved the auditorium, stage and lighting/sound system for use by Driver Opera House and DHS Drama Dept.
    •Approved the use of the high school gym for Alea Lindsay and HalfX Entertainment Dance Team to rehearse.
    •Approved a medical leave for a DEA employee.

Cuts threatening use of local food
School lunches
LFPA cuts_Spring Creek Cattle Company
SPRING CREEK CATTLE COMPANY is one of the local suppliers of food for the North Crawford Foodservice Program. Cancellation of federal funding will impact both the school district and the local agricultural business. Here, Bart and Amy Mitchell are seen with the beef cattle on pasture in the background. Spring Creeks Cattle Company is a family partnership between three brothers, their families, and their parents.

With the federal government defunding programs around the country, it appears the North Crawford School District Food Service department will feel the impact.

Programs that fund food service at North Crawford, like the Local Food for Schools (LFS) and the Patrick Leahy Farm to School Grant, had their funds frozen on March 7, when the USDA announced they would be terminating those programs. 

For North Crawford, this means they have lost funding for purchasing food from local farms, something that the food service department has prided itself on. This summer, the district is covered for their efforts in serving local food. 

25% sourced locally

North Crawford Food Service Director Jen Kapinus said in story published last summer that about 25% of the food served at the school is local, and specifically beef, pork, and apples are the most commonly locally sourced.

Now, that 25% is likely to drop, depending on the department’s next steps, which will have a large impact on the future of the school and the food service department.

Because of the timing of the USDA’s announcement, the food service department will have very little flexibility in the coming school year. In February, commodity orders are due, while the grant money comes in during May. Since, commodities were ordered with the assurance of getting this money in May, the department will have to figure out how to get the food still needed.

“We can no longer make the purchases we planned,” Kapinus said. “We planned ahead for two years, and there’s no money for that now.”

Having to find food to replace the planned purchases is not the only trouble with these cuts. It will also put a strain on the budget and the local farmers who provide for the program, and it will cause the department to move backwards in quality.  

Cuts strain district

These cuts also put a strain on the district because they now need to work through existing suppliers to get food that they typically would not get from them. 

“(The budget cuts) result in us having to look elsewhere,” North Crawford Superintendent Brandon Munson said.

It is not just the school district feeling the impact of the cuts. Good partnerships with our local families and farmers are being lost.

Although Munson believes it won’t hurt them too badly financially, Harry Young, of Young Family Farms LLC, who has been providing meat to the district since 2020, is sad to see these programs go. 

Young noted the impact on the local economy. It supported farmers in the area and kept that money local. 

“It was a good program,” Young said. “It got fresher food to the kids, that was more nutritious than what could be bought through the supply chain.”

Since higher quality food costs more, the department will have to compromise the quality of the food they are purchasing. Aside from the nutritional benefits of higher quality food, higher quality ingredients tend to make the food taste better. 

While the department gets more local food than nearby schools, and students enjoy the food, many already feel that what they are being served is more processed than they would like it to be.

Kapinus believes that the reduction in quality will affect meal participation, which the program relies on to be able to serve the students the best they can. 

Meal participation is often a domino effect. When more students eat the food, the program has a bigger budget to buy better food, which leads to more participation, but if the quality goes down, less students will eat, which will shrink the budget, which leads to even lower quality and, therefore, less participation.

Kapinus is hopeful that, through donations and possible fundraising, the department can continue to serve high-quality meals to students, but it will take a lot of hard work and support. 

It can be difficult to rely on such variable methods, though. The district recently received a donation from a local farm, but there is so much to be cautious about with donations, especially with meat. It also is not consistent. Both fundraising and donations cannot be planned for ahead of time because if the needs are not met, the meals can’t be made.

Despite these hurdles, the department is doing what they can to serve the best meals with what is available to them, but there will have to be a decline in quality because of the cost of food.

“There will definitely be a compromise,” Kapinus said, “but we will continue to do as much scratch cooking as possible, and we are trying to find a happy medium between hyper-local and hyper-processed.”

Kapinus is working to prepare for the future, despite the funding losses, but it is unclear what will happen as time goes on, especially with the federal government aiming to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education. 

With bad news after bad news for the food service department, a glimmer of hope has come in the form of school lunch debt forgiveness.

Through School Lunch Fairy, a national program based in Florida, The North Crawford School District will be receiving a donation to cover a portion of school lunch debt owed. 

School Lunch Fairy is a charity organization that uses donated funds from all over the country to support school districts struggling with school lunch debt and sets up emergency lunch funds to provide struggling students with free lunches before they fall into debt. 

With the donation this program will give the district, it puts the food service department in a better standing and relieves some of struggling students’ financial stress.

This program gives Kapinus and the food service department hope for where they are headed, even when things the future is unpredictable.